Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Naperville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Marion Heintz
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    My family and I placed my mother in Meadowbrook Manor because of her advanced dementia. We struggled with the decision- but we have found the staff is very professional. They take excellent care of my mother and are genuinely concerned about her. The atmosphere is always cheery and the patients respond to that in a positive way. I never thought my mother would be happy in a nursing home - but she has adjusted very well, seems happy, and most importantly she is safe with people that I trust 24 hours a day! Thank you for all your hard work - I know it is not easy - Marion

  • Tonika White
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    If I could give this place 0 stars I would. Horrible, unprofessional, dirty, and not worth your time or money. We got my family member out of there as soon as possible. She was in for rehabilitation and they tried to keep her longer than necessary to get more money from the insurance company. Don't put your loved ones here...they don't watch them or genuinely care for them. I could do their job better for them and not be certified in anything.

  • Jeff
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Meadowbrook Manor Naperville is The Facility That Works! The Number One Reason it holds together and accomodates resident needs is it's 5 STAR Executive Director/Administrator. Mark has worked with me from the start with finance, then with living accomodations, then with transportation getting us to surgery from the facility at appointment time, resolving occasional conflicts. The nursing is competent and at least 5 nurses I have met are 5 star (one six star). Lots of ground to cover so they race walk through the day. Caveat: This facility will work with you BUT you must do some serious homework, be there and interface with nurses, CNAs, ANPs and doctors to help them understand what accomodations might help your loved ones and what difficulties they are having. The professionals are moving as fast as they can, so if you can become a team member, the facility can work for you, as it does for us.

  • Mona Zubi
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Awful place. Awful experience. The nurses don't know what they are doing and wouldn't even care to help my mother. I wouldn't even put my dog in this place. Also, medical machinary is extremely outdated and just awful. Smelly, dirty, and ugly!

  • Kennedy King
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I am very satisfied with both the therapy program and staff at Meadowbrook Manor. Overall, I am very satisfied with my own experience.

About Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville

General Information

Legal Business NameButterfield Health Care Ii Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 20, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity245
Residents222
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville

Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 16, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

September 20, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

September 8, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

November 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.4%
94.7%
94.7%
94.7%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.7%
97.6%
97.6%
94.2%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.7%
55.2%
61.4%
52.2%
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.4%
19.0%
17.5%
18.8%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.9%
13.2%
9.7%
14.9%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.5%
13.9%
14.1%
12.1%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.7%
4.4%
6.8%
8.4%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.2%
9.2%
9.3%
7.6%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5%
7.5%
7.8%
10.7%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4%
4.8%
5.3%
3.6%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
40.8%
42.8%
40.0%
30.4%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
7.0%
4.4%
2.4%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
2.4%
2.4%
2.9%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
4.9%
3.4%
3.6%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

71.4%
72.6%
62.4%
59.0%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.3%
75.0%
75.0%
75.0%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.8%
53.4%
48.2%
60.4%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.6%
31.0%
22.8%
16.9%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
0.0%
2.2%
5.1%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places