Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Tabor Hills Health Care Fac

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Illinois
  3. Naperville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Karla Ravandi
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    A caring, clean and supportive community, Tabor Hills Staff and Nursing have not only been there for my Mother, but for our family as well. Good communication is key, and I appreciate how pro-active they are in keeping us updated and in the know regrading my mother and her health. Thank you!

  • k corn
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The nursing staff is excellent. The administrative staff is manipulative. They direct your family to fill out an application, all the while planning to reject you. It's all wrapped up in their ability to continue to collect millions in government subsidizes and pick and choose the minimum number of applicants they have to in order to qualify for government subsidy. It is amazing to me that the State can sue to get mentally ill people in here, while allowing the facility to continue to deny eligible applicants who are not mentally ill.

  • Kenneth Peluso
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Excellent Nursing Staff and Care but terrible social services and financial administration. Yes, I am upset as I write this review! First off let me say that the nursing staff, aides, and medical care given to my mother-in-law were top notch. So was the physical and occupational therapy team. The facility is very clean and most of the floor staff is very attentive. Our gripe is with the administrative end of the organization for not doing their job and not proactively working with families to figure out what options are available and what would work for the elderly patients. My mother-in-law went to Tabor Hills to get back on her feet after a fall that broke her hip. Having never dealt with elder care issues, my wife and I were lost and searching for answers. Don't expect any help from the social services team at Tabor Hills. To make a long story short, make sure your loved one has a lot of cash in the bank and readily available if you want to gain access to Tabor Hills long term. Also, do not hold any expectation that they will approve your application without said liquid assets readily available. Most importantly, have very specific conversations about your situation early in the process if you are having any thoughts of keeping your loved one there after Medicare says you are done. Otherwise you will find yourself without a plan while Tabor Hills is asking you to leave. By the way, make sure you arrange to get your loved one a walker or other required medical equipment as you won't get much help from Tabor Hills Social Services department!

  • Steven Picciuolo
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Enjoyed the wheelchair swing with Mom today...*****

  • Gigin Krishnan
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Good

About Tabor Hills Health Care Fac

General Information

Legal Business NameTabor Hills Healthcare Facility, Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 25, 1995 (23 years)
Capacity112
Residents84
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Tabor Hills Health Care Fac

Tabor Hills Health Care Fac was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 20, 2017 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

March 17, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Tabor Hills Health Care Fac require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 60min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
2hr 30min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
7hr 5min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.8%
98.8%
98.8%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.6%
91.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.2%
50.0%
59.1%
43.8%
44.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.2%
6.8%
7.0%
9.5%
21.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.5%
23.8%
14.4%
15.8%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.2%
10.5%
8.7%
14.5%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
14.0%
8.9%
17.5%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.2%
6.7%
7.2%
5.7%
7.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
6.8%
12.7%
6.2%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
2.7%
2.9%
8.6%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
5.7%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
1.2%
1.2%
1.1%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.4%
94.8%
95.5%
94.0%
76.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.0%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
73.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.5%
67.0%
59.7%
59.3%
64.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
1.1%
11.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places