Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Pleasant View Luther Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Illinois
  3. Ottawa Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Diana Krug
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My mother was a resident for about one month... she went in for rehab and General overall care. The care was excellent and when she was discharged she was in excellent health... she is 94 and able to live in her own home..... The physical therapy staff was amazing... they seemed to be generally concerned that my mom would be able to go home.

  • Kelly
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My grandpa is in Pleasant View currently and has been treated very well. Much better than the other place he was at. He is finally healing and truly being taken care of properly! He enjoys it there as well. I never have to worry and we know he is safe.

  • Mary Jo Farrell
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Our organization recently had a luncheon at Pleasant View. We were seated in a lovely dining area. Chef Charlie provided us with a delicious lunch, including a yummy dessert. Jennifer and Steve made sure our needs were met and made us feel welcome. We will definitely be going back to Pleasant View!

  • Kristal Nodland
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Pleasant View has been one of the Ottawa Area Chamber of Commerce's best supporters. Their investment in the community is driven in large by their passion for individuals. The Pleasant View team continually thinks about the approaches and opportunities to maximize their benefit to the community, how to take action and make the commitments to inspire, ignite and unite the employees, residents, business and community as a whole.

  • Sandra McGrath
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My grandparents have lived at Pleasant View for years. The care has always been outstanding. The activities are excellent. Great variety of food options.

About Pleasant View Luther Home

General Information

Legal Business NamePleasant View Luther Home Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1994 (25 years)
Capacity90
Residents77
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Pleasant View Luther Home

Pleasant View Luther Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 17, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.

August 11, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Pleasant View Luther Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.4%
95.5%
95.5%
95.5%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1%
98.3%
98.2%
98.2%
91.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
26.9%
48.0%
45.8%
33.3%
44.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
21.4%
23.5%
23.6%
21.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.0%
17.4%
25.2%
12.0%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
11.9%
11.1%
14.3%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.5%
16.7%
12.0%
22.2%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.8%
13.8%
9.3%
5.3%
7.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
2.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
3.5%
5.6%
3.9%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
1.7%
1.9%
10.5%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
5.1%
7.3%
8.8%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6%
1.7%
3.4%
3.4%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.9%
92.0%
90.7%
90.4%
76.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.7%
90.1%
90.1%
90.1%
73.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.1%
80.1%
74.3%
66.1%
64.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.0%
2.0%
3.3%
9.0%
11.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places