Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Roseville Rehab & Health Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Roseville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Roseville Rehab & Health Care

General Information

Legal Business NamePetersen Health Care Roseville LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 2002 (15 years)
Capacity99
Residents61
Percent Occupied62%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Roseville Rehab & Health Care

Roseville Rehab & Health Care
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 14, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionSend unopened mail from residents and promptly deliver unopened mail to residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

March 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

January 14, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.

May 22, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Roseville Rehab & Health Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 50min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.3%
98.4%
98.4%
98.4%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
10.0%
2.9%
2.8%
5.9%
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.3%
23.9%
20.4%
20.5%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
3.4%
5.3%
5.1%
3.1%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.2%
19.2%
9.8%
14.9%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.3%
6.8%
6.4%
7.0%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1%
5.1%
8.8%
17.0%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5%
10.0%
3.1%
4.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
3.5%
5.4%
4.2%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
3.4%
3.5%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
1.7%
1.7%
1.9%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
1.6%
0.0%
2.1%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.2%
97.9%
100.0%
96.8%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.7%
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.1%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
-
-
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.7%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened