Rolling Hills Manor
Photos
Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★
-
Brittany Kinsley★★★★★ 2 months agoSome of the people that work there are absolute Angels, it is an extremely challenging job but I find a treat my grandmother very well. The food there has been decent. We had limited options because of travel distance but they seem to be a wonderful place for her. We feel safe w her there.
-
John p. Sorg★★★★★ 2 months ago???????????????????????? I have nothing bad to say about Rolling Hills Manor. They've been exemplary with my in-laws helping them to recover from serious physical ailments. They've also offered suggestions for care afterwards when they are released. The staff has been fantastic as my wife can attest to, they actually let my wife host an anniversary party for my in-laws while they were in the facility, their 62nd anniversary. I've noticed they've had live music inside the facility, they have a nice cafeteria, they encourage mingling and Association. They do have very good rehabilitation services and the rooms look very comfortable. I would say this would be a good facility to use if you are looking for rehabilitation services. One thing I've noticed is the facility is very clean, like Hospital clean. ??????????
-
Dave Skofstad★★★★★ a year agoStaff has been very insensitive and not willing to provide good care. They made Mom disrobe with males in the room to "check for bruises." Last night they forced her up from a deep sleep and disrobe again to "check for bruises." Doctor ordered them to dress her open wound every two to three days. My wife had to force them to do it after five days.
-
Nena Onti★★★★★ a year agoMy Mom is being treated with respect, love and compassion like no other place, the staff really cares about the patient's needs. I really appreciate everything they have treated my Mom.
-
Michael Mullen★★★★★ 7 years agoBeautiful grounds. Amazing staff!! They know their rehab.
About Rolling Hills Manor
General Information
| Legal Business Name | Slovak American Charitable Association |
| Ownership Type | Non Profit - Other |
| Changed Ownership In The Last 12 Months | No |
| First Accepted Medicare | March 22, 1982 (37 years) |
| Capacity | 115 |
| Residents | 101 |
| Percent Occupied | 88% |
| Program Participation | Medicare And Medicaid |
| Resident And Family Councils | Resident |
| In Hospital | No |
| Continuing Care Retirement Community | No |
| Special Focus Facility | No |
| Auto Sprinkler System In Required Areas | Yes |
Ratings for Rolling Hills Manor
Rolling Hills Manor was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.
About Medicare Ratings | Overall Rating |
| Health Inspections Rating |
 | Quality Measures Rating |
| Staff Rating |
| RN Staff Rating |
Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes
Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years 
Compare The Number of Problems
Types of Problems at Nursing Homes
Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.
| Residents Affected | |||
| Severity of the Deficiency | Few | Some | Many |
| Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety | J | K | L |
| Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy | G | H | I |
| No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy | D | E | F |
| No actual harm with potential for minimal harm | A | B | C |
October 18, 2017 - 16 months ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | Many | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Store, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way. |
November 16, 2016 - 2 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | Some | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Have a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading. |
Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day
Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rolling Hills Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.
| 2hr 35min | 2hr 30min |
| Reported | Expected |
| CNA | |
| 50min | 40min |
| Reported | Expected |
| LPN | |
| 55min | 1hr 5min |
| Reported | Expected |
| RN | |
| 4hr 25min | 4hr 15min |
| Reported | Expected |
| Total Nursing | |
This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.
Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents
| 96.4% | 96.3% | 96.3% | 96.3% | 92.8% | 94.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 91.3% | 94.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 58.3% | 51.5% | 52.0% | 38.1% | 44.5% | 47.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 10.7% | 10.5% | 14.1% | 13.2% | 21.6% | 22.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 4.1% | 11.4% | 11.2% | 9.5% | 17.1% | 18.2% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 9.0% | 8.8% | 11.2% | 10.8% | 19.3% | 15.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 9.6% | 9.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 6.5% | 6.6% | 9.0% | 6.8% | 7.9% | 7.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 1.8% | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 15.1% | 19.9% | 13.1% | 12.6% | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 14.5% | 13.3% | 17.1% | 14.3% | 18.8% | 4.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 3.9% | 2.6% | 5.1% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 2.6% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 4.1% | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents
| 98.8% | 99.4% | 99.4% | 100.0% | 76.0% | 83.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 92.0% | 95.2% | 95.2% | 95.2% | 73.2% | 81.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 67.5% | 69.2% | 71.6% | 72.3% | 64.3% | 67.5% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 26.1% | 24.2% | 25.5% | 23.8% | 11.0% | 13.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.8% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 1.4% | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.5% | 0.5% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
