Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Waters Of Batesville, The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Batesville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Waters Of Batesville, The

General Information

Legal Business NameMajor Hospital
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 30, 1984 (33 years)
Capacity86
Residents59
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Waters Of Batesville, The

Waters Of Batesville, The
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 28, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

March 1, 2016 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

November 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Receive registry verification that a nurse aide has met the required training and skills that the State requires; and 2) ensure nurse aides receive the required retraining after 24 months if nursing related services were not provided for monetary compe
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

October 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

January 14, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Waters Of Batesville, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3%
94.6%
93.1%
91.2%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.1%
42.9%
27.3%
19.0%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.8%
41.5%
35.1%
36.4%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
41.1%
28.0%
27.1%
39.1%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
24.5%
18.0%
23.1%
20.4%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.0%
28.0%
13.7%
21.6%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
11.1%
7.8%
5.2%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.5%
14.3%
32.8%
12.5%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
7.5%
7.5%
5.3%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
1.9%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3%
1.8%
3.4%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
1.8%
0.0%
3.5%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
9.4%
6.6%
3.1%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.7%
97.4%
83.9%
83.1%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.1%
92.1%
92.1%
92.1%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.1%
55.5%
67.6%
62.1%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.4%
26.7%
21.4%
25.8%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
2.0%
4.9%
2.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened