Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brownsburg Meadows

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Brownsburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I chose to have Brownsburg Meadows care for my aging mother with dementia which was progressively getting worse over the past year or two. Brownsburg Meadows' Memory Care Unit is great. The staff is great. Mom is constantly engaged in activities. Every time I come visit the residents and staff always appear to be having fun. I'm glad I made the choice to have Brownsburg Meadows take care of my mother. They really do care and it shows.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    My mother had stayed here for rehabilitation after she slipped and fell on ice and broke her hip. The facility was wonderful. The staff was caring. I recommend anyone that needs to go through rehabilitation to go to Brownsburg Meadows.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I am using my husbands google account to protect my identity. I worked here as a CNA and a housekeeper. Every CNA there goes against training and safety procedures because they are under staffed. And when staffing isn't an issue its still hard to get help or have anyone help you with the residents. As a CNA that worked there, I had to do many many things against company procedure that the CNA teacher allowed to happen. People's lives are at risk here. I quit when Travis 'forgot' to pump someones lungs from fluid build up, and when the resident was lifted the fluid spread through his lungs and he started passing away on me and the aide that was helping me. Travis always said I killed him and joked about it. 1. That was someones father that your joking about and 2. if he would had done his duties as a nurse the gentleman would had lived a little longer (not to say that his life really was livable or enjoyable, he was in some pain). When I brought this to the directors attention I was merely pushed aside because I was only an aide. Not an actual nurse. Beware. Dangerous home for family (especially if they are later dementia and can't tell you what is happening/how they are treated).

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I had the pleasure of staying at Brownsburg Meadows for a fall I took breaking four ribs. The staff and aides could not do enough to make my stay comfortable and made sure my therapy was done per the doctors orders!!!! Best rehab center I have ever experienced Theresa Holman

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great place for granny

About Brownsburg Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 22, 2007 (11 years)
Capacity147
Residents125
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brownsburg Meadows

Brownsburg Meadows
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 23, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

October 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brownsburg Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.3%
99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.9%
71.4%
70.0%
60.0%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.0%
6.0%
12.7%
9.9%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.0%
14.8%
13.0%
8.6%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.5%
18.3%
13.1%
10.5%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6%
8.9%
5.3%
13.6%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.4%
12.8%
4.6%
2.2%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.0%
4.5%
9.0%
8.8%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.3%
13.0%
6.2%
11.2%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
3.2%
1.1%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
2.1%
5.7%
7.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.9%
1.7%
1.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.0%
1.1%
2.3%
2.2%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.1%
97.5%
96.7%
96.2%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.3%
94.0%
94.0%
94.0%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.5%
75.5%
73.7%
75.5%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.5%
4.7%
5.0%
4.7%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
2.7%
2.1%
0.7%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.0%
0.7%
0.3%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places