Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brownsburg Meadows

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Brownsburg Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ronchale Watson
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I just love the feeling as soon as I walk in the door! I'm always greeted with a smile the staff is so loving and caring. If I have any questions they always have the answer. I would highly recommend this facility to everyone!

  • Tonya Pepperworth
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    The staff works so well together to ensure that the residents receive the best care possible.

  • Nicole Lane
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Love my staff and residents. Great place to work!

  • JayRe20
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    The staff members are very friendly and caring. They really care about the residents and their families.

  • BRYAN PEARCY
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    This facility is ran very well. It's clean and the staff are very friendly, caring and professional.

About Brownsburg Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 22, 2007 (11 years)
Capacity147
Residents129
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brownsburg Meadows

Brownsburg Meadows was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 3, 2017 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

August 23, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

October 9, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brownsburg Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
99.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.5%
69.6%
63.8%
72.5%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.3%
9.7%
10.1%
10.4%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.8%
38.4%
11.6%
8.2%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.2%
4.1%
9.8%
6.5%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.5%
16.1%
17.3%
4.8%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.0%
7.8%
6.6%
3.6%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
6.1%
2.9%
0.9%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
1.9%
1.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.6%
13.1%
16.2%
21.4%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.9%
4.9%
5.7%
4.5%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.4%
99.5%
99.5%
98.9%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
97.5%
97.5%
97.5%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.1%
62.4%
68.3%
74.4%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.0%
3.2%
5.6%
4.3%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
0.7%
1.4%
0.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places