Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Danville Regional Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Danville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Florice Carnes
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    There's alot of nice things about this facility but if i had to choose my favorite thing, it would be that all the staff is so nice. I greatly appreciate being well taken care of and the time the staff takes out of their day to come and visit with me. It's always nice for a social person like me to have someone to talk to. I recommend this facility to future staff members and residents.

  • Nila Nolan
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Out of the numerous times I have been here, the staff has always helped me. They are very respectful, nice and you can tell they really care about their residents. They have a great activities and therapy team. The staff in the front office is always willing to help me when i need something and the administrator is wonderful and always willing to talk to you. I have never met another person who is so caring and passionate about her job. Thank you Danville Regional Rehab for all you do for me. I appreciate you guys more than words could explain!

  • Rob R
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I have lived here going on two years and for the most part i have really enjoyed my time here. The staff does their best to make the residents feel like family and they make sure to meet the needs of their residents. I have made some really awesome friends and i cant imagine not having them in my life as forever friends. I would recommend Danville Regional Rehab to my friends, family and others around the community.

  • Dulcie Wyatt
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Being a resident here has changed my life for the better. I have made plenty of friends along the way. The nursing, therapy and activities teams here are phenomenal. This building has been a part of my life for 5 years and there's not a day that goes by that I don't tell the staff how much I appreciate them. If I was ever to be asked I would recommend this facility to everyone.

  • Angela Rader
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    They were absolutely horrible to my mother. She was transferred there for rehab and they had no idea how to operate the equipment she was required to use and they left her in severe pain for hours because they were busy. We got her out as quickly as we could and during check out they refused to give her medication to her to take home.

About Danville Regional Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1972 (47 years)
Capacity110
Residents86
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Danville Regional Rehabilitation

Danville Regional Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 3, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHelp and prepare each resident for a safe and easy discharge or transfer from the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Danville Regional Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 55min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.6%
39.0%
40.0%
35.6%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.5%
26.4%
29.9%
28.4%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.8%
2.3%
2.3%
4.1%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.9%
11.3%
13.6%
11.4%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.4%
4.3%
0.0%
2.7%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6%
0.0%
1.4%
7.2%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
2.9%
1.4%
6.2%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
62.3%
59.4%
66.7%
57.0%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6%
5.6%
2.8%
1.2%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
99.1%
99.1%
99.0%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
35.1%
34.0%
43.3%
56.5%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places