Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

University Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Evansville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    They have a few really great aides and nurses that's it the rest are strung out on drugs and popping pills and whatever else they can get their hands on while on duty. The management is a joke they could care less about the residents and their needs or wants all they care about is money and making sure things are swept under the rug. Restorative aides don't do their jobs and the residents slowly decline because of it and residents are scared to say anything to anyone because as they put it we have to live here and I don't want to be miserable so I just keep my mouth shut unless you have family that makes sure people are doing what they are supposed to be doing and are working instead of playing on their phones or outside smoking then I wouldn't suggest sending a loved one to this facility

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    This was a wonderful home for our Mom when she moved in about 2 years ago. But, the facility was sold to another company. In the last few months there have been significant changes, none of which have been for the better! The two most important factors to our Mom's satisfaction are good, consistent aids. People she recognizes and feels she can depend upon. And the quality of the food. The turn-over in personnel has been tumultuous! I rarely see any of the aids stay for more than a month or two. These are the most important people for our Mom. They are the face of University Nursing and Rehab to all of the folks in the home. Yet, there is no consistency, which leaves Mom feeling far less secure than before these changes occurred. The other factor that is important to Mom's day to day living is the food. The quality has dropped significantly! The cooks are the same, so, clearly, the change in quality is due to reducing the quality of the food purchased for the facility. These two factors have had a very noticeable effect on Mom's happiness with life! On top of the degradation of Mom's day to day quality of life, the company has notified us that there will be a 23% price increase! I wanted to appeal the price increase with the corporation. But, I have not been able to make any contacts at the corporate level. I found an 800-number, but it was not the correct number to discuss an appeal. I was promised that I would be called back with an appropriate contact phone number. Two days passed, with multiple messages left by me. Finally I called the local number and was told that I could not speak with anyone in corporate. That the price increase could not be appealed! So, . . . . . significantly lower quality of care, significantly higher price, and a company that does not want to speak with the client or her representative! WOW! Kinda says it all! - All they (whoever "they" are) do not care for the people in their facility, the clients or the employees! All they care about is the $!

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Love this community! I visit a family friend and his care has also been exceptional.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    These people treat my family like family.

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

About University Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameAdams County Memorial Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 28, 2014 (3 years)
Capacity47
Residents45
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for University Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

University Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 12, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

March 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

January 28, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of University Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

77.8%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.7%
41.4%
42.9%
40.0%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.7%
37.5%
35.7%
31.6%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.9%
15.8%
24.4%
3.2%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.9%
17.4%
8.9%
7.1%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.8%
44.7%
15.4%
18.2%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.7%
18.6%
29.9%
25.7%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.0%
6.7%
0.0%
4.8%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.2%
11.1%
12.5%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
2.4%
4.7%
2.4%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.3%
8.7%
2.2%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.8%
4.3%
8.9%
7.1%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
12.7%
11.4%
10.9%
7.8%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places