Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Scenic Hills Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Ferdinand
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Caitlyn Cunningham
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My grandfather (papa) got discharged today and we are writing this review together. In total papa stayed for two weeks. Papa suffers from respiratory issues and upon being discharged from the hospital he needed therapy. Papa is very independent and very stubborn and the only reason he agreed to go to the nursing home was because I convinced him. Overall he had a good experience at scenic hills. The first night he was there he didn't sleep well because his roommate had the heat turned up VERY high. The next morning when I came to see him he was sweating and said he felt terrible. I talked to the nurse Amanda (such a caring and all around NICE person) and she was able to switch his room within the next few hours where he stayed the rest of his time. Papa absolutely LOVED the therapy nurses. He said they really enjoy their job and they take their time with every patient. He said they did FANTASTIC! Upon his discharge from scenic hills they made sure to send home exercises he could continue at home which I greatly appreciated. Excellent therapy nurses. My grandfather usually went home during the day, after his therapy sessions, and came back at night. Which made the entire transition so much easier for him. The staff was pretty nice and were kind to him. Papa really didn't mind the stay and I am thankful for the care he received. The only complaint he had was his bed wasnt always made and he didn't enjoy that. I however have one complaint that I hope the staff will take to heart. My grandfather was informed by one of the activities lady that the nurses were saying he went home during the day to drink. PURE RUMOR. my grandfather hasn't had a drink in my entire lifetime and I am 21 years old. When he told me about it I was offended. I know how the rumor mill works and I know it's all speculation but you are a professional place of business and the fact that this was said to my grandfather is not okay. Keep your nose in your work and not in other's business.

About Scenic Hills Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameGood Samaritan Hospital
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 21, 1993 (24 years)
Capacity88
Residents82
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Scenic Hills Care Center

Scenic Hills Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 26, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

June 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Scenic Hills Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.5%
91.8%
92.1%
91.1%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.6%
53.6%
41.9%
50.0%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.4%
16.9%
16.7%
22.6%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.7%
6.0%
12.6%
14.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.8%
26.1%
23.6%
23.3%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.8%
7.0%
5.0%
19.4%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
2.2%
2.3%
0.0%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2%
8.2%
10.5%
10.3%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
5.1%
3.6%
5.5%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
0.0%
3.9%
5.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.4%
2.6%
5.1%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.6%
74.4%
77.1%
63.2%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.0%
75.6%
75.6%
75.6%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.7%
0.0%
5.6%
12.9%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places