Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Renaissance Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Fort Wayne
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

About Renaissance Village

General Information

Legal Business NamePulaski Memorial Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 15, 1988 (29 years)
Capacity96
Residents72
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Renaissance Village

Renaissance Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 18, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintLet residents choose a personal doctor.

October 26, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

August 19, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 3 days
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

January 27, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

November 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

September 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

July 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

October 27, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Renaissance Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
62.1%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.7%
50.0%
50.0%
-
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.6%
9.3%
8.9%
15.8%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.2%
21.1%
21.3%
25.8%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.9%
12.5%
14.3%
24.6%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4%
29.2%
17.4%
34.0%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.6%
5.3%
3.7%
6.5%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3%
1.7%
3.4%
12.7%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
11.6%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.4%
14.0%
10.5%
5.4%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.8%
8.6%
10.3%
3.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
3.4%
3.4%
4.5%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
9.2%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.7%
87.5%
90.0%
71.4%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.0%
83.3%
83.3%
83.3%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened