Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Asbury Towers Health Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Greencastle Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kathleen Kyle
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Father in law admitted here for rehab to home program. He is very satisfied with his care and likes the staff, food and therapy. All the staff is extremely nice and professional. Vicki from admissions and Stephanie Director of Nursing are very helpful and always available if you need them. It is an older facility, but very clean. Lots of activities and food very good. Family can dine with residents also. Very impressed with this facility as a former nurse. Highly recommend this facility.

  • Thomas Teal
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Upon my father arriving to Mill Pond for a few weeks of rehabilitation, I stayed a few hours to make sure he got settled in ok. After never being offered at least some water (let alone anything else), I called Asbury Towers that evening upon arriving back home to leave a message hoping for a call first thing in the morning. To my surprise (and delight), I got a call from Vicki with Asbury Towers admissions office (nicest lady I've met and spoken to in quite some time) calling me back on her personal time not a half hour later. That alone spoke volumes to me. She really did seem concerned over my Dad's welfare and after a few reassurances, I felt a weight being lifted and agreed to transfer him the next morning. After getting everything approved, I immediately went and picked my father up from Mill Pond (although they requested a "second chance") and took him to Asbury Towers where we were greeted by Vicki herself. Not only was my Dad taken to his room and offered some water, but 4-5 times just while I was there, various personnel came in to check on his well being and needs/preferences. Within the first few days, most every time I showed up and at various times, he was either getting his PT a couple times a day, eating, getting assistance with walking, help with his showers and the list goes on along with various activities that are offered. One time while he was at PT in the afternoon while I was waiting on his return, a lady stopped by his room to see if he'd like a chocolate brownie ice cream for a mid-afternoon snack (was on a non-restrictive diet). When she seen he wasn't there, she asked if I'd like one as well. Another time I arrived unannounced, I was taken back by seeing my Dad being walked around outside around the block with one of their therapist holding his arm just in case he were to lose his balance. That personally really set the bar high for me compared to other facilities. I have never driven by or visited other places and seen that. It seems most patients are just put on an exercise bike and left alone for awhile. Fast forward about a month now, my father has been released. When he got there, he had been experiencing occasional falls and using a walker or cane was a way of life for him. Since he's been back home, he occasionally tries to move around without even his cane (although we take it to him when we catch him doing it). But he "can" do it now. He says he's not having knee or back pain that kept him couch/bed bound anymore and he hasn't asked for the last couple of pain killers he had. We've been able to discard them and haven't missed them a bit. Absolutely wonderful and thoughtful people throughout this facility and I very highly recommend.

  • Tristan French
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Luckily my grandmother can do things very independently, and has recently made the change from the 3rd floor to the 1st. She has been ripped of all her independence and they treat her just ok, more like a prisoner. I'm thankful she is still able to care for herself and still has her mind, or else she would be kept in a bed all day long, and left in the same position without any adjusting. I feel so bad for her neighbors, the ones who aren't in as good of shape as she is. They are left yelling for help, in the same uncomfortable position all day long and not acknowledge at all. I honestly wouldn't recommend my worst enemy here, and wish I could take my grandmother out of here. Luckily she still has a voice.

  • Lex Sowards
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

  • Michelle McClure
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

About Asbury Towers Health Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePutnam County Hospital
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 29, 2006 (13 years)
Capacity48
Residents37
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Asbury Towers Health Care Center

Asbury Towers Health Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 22, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

April 25, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,525 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Asbury Towers Health Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.4%
97.4%
97.4%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.2%
26.9%
20.0%
20.0%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.7%
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.1%
15.6%
18.2%
26.7%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.0%
4.0%
25.0%
20.0%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.6%
11.5%
7.7%
4.5%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
3.0%
0.0%
3.2%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
92.3%
96.6%
97.1%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.8%
92.0%
92.0%
92.0%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
4.5%
3.3%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
9.1%
11.1%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
3.7%
3.6%
6.2%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places