Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sugar Creek Rehabilitation And Convalescent Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Greenfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Vince Wylde
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My wife's grandmother lived here for 3 years before she passed. Look, no nursing home is great. It's a business. But, Kindred wouldn't allow any luxury at all, strict everything. This place at least gave her Diet Pepsi and palatable food and treated her like a human being. Could it be better? Yeah, but to do that, these places need to be non-profit.

  • Kevin Williams
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    These poor poor people...where do I start? The I dont give a care attitude of the nursing staff? The lack of attendance to the patients...lack of personal hygiene care, or should I start with the smell of fecal material that smacks you in the face when you enter the front doors...these poor patients are improperly medicated, poorly cared for and are in my humble opinion being taken advantage of. Bottom line...please..if you want to give your loved ones any dignity at all...don't send them to this place.

  • S. Teitge
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I would not give this place any stars but it would not post without one. I visited on June 22 & 23, 2019 to see my sister. At the main door I went to the nearest nurses station and asked for my sister's room. I was told they had no one by the name I had given them. And I was directed to go to the recovery place in front of this building. My sister arrived there on June 11th so maybe the lady wasn't knowledgable of that. Another nurse heard the conversation and corrected the first and showed me to my sister's room. The stench of urine was in the air but I could not tell where it was coming from.The trash can was full and the nurse removed the bag and took it out but the smell was still there. We visited for a short time, there were no chairs to sit down and with the smell it was a short visit. Sunday morning at 10 am we returned. The stench of urine was stronger. I opened the bathroom door to fill my sister's water jug and there, in front of the toilet, was a pile of dirty bed sheets about 5 feet tall- the origin of the stench!! My sister needed a kleenex but there were none in the room. I went to find her some while my husband went to get some ice for the water jug. I met a cleaning lady down the second hall who gave me a box with some tissues in it. This was my first visit to Sugar Creek and it made a very POOR first impression. I do plan on visiting again and hope for much improvement.

  • Michael Osos
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Friendly caring staff, No one sleeping on the floor!!! Great food, Clean, WI-FI and Cable TV... Great Rehab staff, Fair Medical care... Outdoor supervised smoking !!! YES SMOKING!!! Nice country setting... Only complaint, weak coffee & not enough of it...

  • shawntay orr
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This nursing home is terrible. The people there don't care about the patients. I have so many problems with them. My mother hates it there.i came there plenty of times and people was lying on floors and dirty. They are so rude and unprofessional. I wouldn't recommend this place to anyone .

About Sugar Creek Rehabilitation And Convalescent Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1985 (34 years)
Capacity60
Residents45
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sugar Creek Rehabilitation And Convalescent Center

Sugar Creek Rehabilitation And Convalescent Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 18, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a post-discharge plan with the resident and family for the resident's care after leaving the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

February 16, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

January 31, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

December 14, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sugar Creek Rehabilitation And Convalescent Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 10min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 5min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.6%
97.9%
97.9%
97.9%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.8%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
13.0%
28.0%
32.1%
55.2%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.1%
7.0%
7.9%
10.0%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.1%
41.2%
41.5%
56.2%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
45.5%
38.7%
34.6%
55.2%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.9%
21.4%
13.5%
45.9%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.0%
0.0%
2.5%
9.5%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
4.3%
-
13.6%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.5%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2.4%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.0%
4.4%
2.5%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
100.0%
100.0%
90.0%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places