Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Aspen Trace Health & Living Community

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Greenwood Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Mike Gibson
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I am so grateful for the outstanding care and compassion that my loved received while getting rehab at Aspen Trace! The therapy team and nursing staff were very helpful to answer any of our question and showed our family love and respect. After my family member was reaching his goals in therapy and his stay at the facility was coming to an end, the therapist actually came to our house to complete a home assessment. During our home assessment the therapist made recommendations to help us create a safer environment for our loved one. The building was beautiful and clean, and also the food was delicious. If you want your family to receive kindness and compassion during their time of need, I would highly recommend anyone to send their loved one to this beautiful nursing home and rehab facility!

  • Andy Dillman
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Was never so disapointed in a facility as Aspen Trace is. Two falls for my spouse in 2 days is too much when that is what he was in there for. Went in with a brain bleed. I had to ask for everything to be monitored. Did not bring food that was ordered and did not check on him like they were suppose to after the first fall when the next shift came on. Where is the compassion that a person is to have to work in this field. Second night, had one nurse and one aide for 2 wings. People were coming in and out the door with no one at the desk for hours to monitor it. Not a safe place to leave someone you love. I feel so guilty picking out this "place". Did not even deserve 1 star. Left very dissatisfied.

  • carl white
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    This place is absolutely terrible. Our loved one was there for not even 4 weeks and it was awful. Food was terrible, nurses were very rude and even to family that they have never met before and coffee was cold, unacceptable. He had soiled himself and had to lay in it for awhile and it was still on his clothes days later. His laundry was returned to him upon leaving dirty and the clean laundry was not folded and in a ball, they lost his good blanket as well. One of my family members called to speak with the upper management and never has had a returned phone call to her, used the same old excuse that he is in a meeting, that was 10 days ago, must have been a really long one. Overall, very upset with how he was treated and with the staff in general. I would look other places before putting your loved one in the care of Aspen Trace.

  • Kimberly Butler
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Horrible Horrible. Don't answer the phones, can't find anyone to get assistance with your loved one, CNA's sit in the parking lot and smoke all evening and staff is rude if you even ask them a question. Never ever ever taking another loved one there.

  • Joshua West
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    This place doesn't even deserve 1 star. They don't care about ur family members well being. I hope they get shut down!!!

About Aspen Trace Health & Living Community

General Information

Legal Business NameJay County Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareJune 12, 2014 (4 years)
Capacity104
Residents95
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Aspen Trace Health & Living Community

Aspen Trace Health & Living Community was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2017 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

January 31, 2017 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

August 4, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

April 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Aspen Trace Health & Living Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 40min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 15min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

89.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
100.0%
98.5%
98.5%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.6%
61.5%
56.0%
56.0%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.3%
22.2%
19.3%
22.8%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.0%
19.1%
19.2%
20.2%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.3%
14.9%
13.2%
15.4%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7%
12.7%
9.1%
28.6%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.4%
9.3%
9.0%
3.1%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2%
0.0%
3.3%
4.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.3%
1.6%
1.5%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.0%
11.4%
4.6%
4.6%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
2.7%
3.0%
1.6%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3%
8.0%
4.4%
4.6%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.3%
94.4%
90.7%
84.8%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.2%
95.9%
95.9%
95.9%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.9%
62.4%
57.9%
52.5%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.2%
2.3%
4.6%
8.1%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.7%
1.3%
0.8%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places