Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Greenwood Meadows

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Greenwood Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Barbi Stevens
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    Last fall my grandpa fell and broke his arm. He went to the hospital and later developed pneumonia. After spending over a week in the hospital, he was discharged but not in a condition to return home. My family decided to take him to Greenwood Meadows for short term rehab. I have worked in rehab for 10 years. I can say the staff at Greenwood Meadows was amazing. From the floor staff to the management team, they were all compassionate, caring, attentive, transparent, knowledgeable, and accommodating. They went above and beyond to care for my Grandpa and my family. I was beyond pleased with my experience there. I am forever grateful and would definitely recommend them.

  • Dave Lawlis
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    There are an astonishing number of five star reviews for this establishment that were written by users whose only other reviews just so happen to be for Beech Grove Meadows and Franklin Meadows. If staff members have to come on here and pretend to be clients handing out five star reviews in an attempt to deceive and cheat the sick and the elderly then it's probably safe to assume that the establishment has some serious issues. Fortunately, incompetence & stupidity frequently go hand in hand and are available here for all to witness and to serve as a warning.

  • Beth Bigham
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Many of our home care clients have gone into Rehab at Greenwood Meadows. I ask - and many of the people I've talked to said they had a positive experience. Kudos to their team so trying so hard!

  • Garen A
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    If you love your family members keep them away from this place!! Compared to other facilities this one is definitely not as clean, workers who "act" like they care, not to mention the FOOD IS HORRIBLE!! Come on people don't be blinded by the 5 star or even 4 star reviews, those are their own employees posting positive comments about themselves. You should look elsewhere for a good care not!! That's how I feel about fake employees who smile in your face, yet your loves ones may be suffering there....

  • Nakeita Alfonzo
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Greenwood Meadows is a fantastic place to take your love one to if they are in need of short term rehab, memory care or long term care. The Executive Director is phenomenal. He is a family oriented man, that cares deeply about his resident as well as his staff. The Admission Director Anna Olson will work for you endless to make sure your transition is seamless.

About Greenwood Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 2, 2011 (8 years)
Capacity169
Residents159
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Greenwood Meadows

Greenwood Meadows was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 17, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionKeep clinical record information safe.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Greenwood Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.0%
94.9%
94.9%
94.9%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.7%
87.7%
85.1%
73.1%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.5%
20.2%
19.8%
25.9%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.7%
8.6%
9.0%
7.5%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.3%
12.5%
14.4%
14.0%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2%
1.9%
7.5%
9.8%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.4%
12.0%
11.8%
8.5%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8%
1.8%
5.0%
6.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.3%
47.9%
48.3%
39.5%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
4.2%
3.4%
3.3%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.8%
98.2%
99.1%
96.4%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.0%
94.6%
94.6%
94.6%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
26.0%
32.8%
41.8%
45.6%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.4%
0.7%
1.5%
0.8%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
2.3%
3.0%
2.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.4%
0.6%
0.4%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places