Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Greenwood Meadows

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Greenwood Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Barbara Fischer
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Sometime in the last year I reviewed Greenwood Meadows and wanted to reaffirm all I said. The people who have given them poor reviews either have the wrong place or have never seen a bad nursing home. This is a nursing home, its an institution, it's not perfect, it has it's shortcomings. If you want perfect hire home help--and good luck with that too. These people are wonderful. The full time staff is caring to both the resident and family members. The are helpful and concerned. I have made friends in the last year with my dad's full time day nurse, the Asst. DON who is also his hall rep and has been there for us during the last last year. I have made friends with the cleaning lady on his hall and the van driver as well as the head nurse and the receptionist. These are great people dedicated to their jobs who love their residents. Sadly recently Dad had $20 stolen from his wallet--one of his personal possessions and something he can control (we've experienced no other personal possessions disappearing as I hear happens frequently at some nursing homes). The people we reported it to were furious that such thing would be done and in the end are giving Dad a $20 replacement. At his first facility he insisted on keeping $50, it was stolen and the facility's response was shame on him for having so much cash, shame on me for letting him. He agreed to downsize to $20 in his pocket. Also I have learned a lot from van and ambulance transport services when we've used them. They tell me this is an outstanding facility and which ones are a nightmare.

  • Anthony Mayer
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    The staff treat the people there like they're garbage and I wouldn't trust my loved one with anybody there. The way they treat your family there is criminal they should be shut down

  • john Maison
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    mother died there this year due to neglect on the nursing home , short staffed and bad attitudes ..Did'nt even call after she died to send there condolences, they just don't seem to care

  • Lycia McQuilkin
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Pre employment, they offer hepatitis shots but they won't administer them "too expensive", why offer? Nurses will gang up on you. Even setting up direct deposit didn't work, after a month payroll said they needed a letter head from bank, then still wasn't set up. Not a place to learn at all, too many attitudes, hostile environment ruined my energy and mood. Director thinks it's easier to fire an employee who offers constructive feedback in written form rather than employee blowing up on other staff members bc the place isn't ethical, no professional standards. Nurses gossiping about patients and laughing. I was treated like a dog, told to leave a resident in a wet brief to pass trays faster. A bag of bm splattered all over blankets and clothing of a resident whom I didn't change was left for me to clean, nurse told director she thought that I changed the person which was a lie, she didn't like me. Resident who told a student to squeeze his balls accused me of stealing and eating his egg sandwich which was in his fridge, the microwave is in a lounge that had students from bright wood using that lounge, I was passing trays as fast as I could and told the resident that I would get back to him but by the time I was done he told everyone I stole it. Instead of DON looking into the matter she decided to fire me, easier. It's like highschool again, it all depends on who you talk to. Extremely cliquey, I come to work hard and give love, this company will take advantage of hard workers and drive harder. There's no educating but attitudes, not a learning atmosphere at all. Dietary has attitudes as well but the director doesn't see there's a problem with it, no wonder unions aren't allowed to form! I got paid more at the mall ten years ago and did less. Documentation is all made up, Aids don't document residents meals in each dining room. What a joke. Nurses will come running when pt is on the floor but any other time no help. Aids asked me to help them and told me they would help me, they got their work done and went home. Very unprofessional and unethical.

  • Mike Flick
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Greenwood Meadows is a good place for rehab therists are hiley skilled and caring the nurses are also hiley skilled and caring took good care of me.thanks for your effort of getting me where I am now.

About Greenwood Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 2, 2011 (7 years)
Capacity169
Residents159
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Greenwood Meadows

Greenwood Meadows was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 17, 2017 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionKeep clinical record information safe.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

December 11, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Greenwood Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.0%
94.9%
94.9%
94.9%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.7%
87.7%
85.1%
73.1%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.5%
20.2%
19.8%
25.9%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.7%
8.6%
9.0%
7.5%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.3%
12.5%
14.4%
14.0%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2%
1.9%
7.5%
9.8%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.4%
12.0%
11.8%
8.5%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8%
1.8%
5.0%
6.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.3%
47.9%
48.3%
39.5%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
4.2%
3.4%
3.3%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.8%
98.2%
99.1%
96.4%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.0%
94.6%
94.6%
94.6%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
26.0%
32.8%
41.8%
45.6%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.4%
0.7%
1.5%
0.8%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
2.3%
3.0%
2.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.4%
0.6%
0.4%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places