Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Hobart Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Joi Cotton
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Hello newcomers! Sebo's is a very nice place to work. I love the staff and I love the residents. Best administrator you could have as well! (gives out tons of bonuses & candy). Highly recommend this place of business to anyone.

  • Patty Dixon
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Saturday was a great Christmas party. The families came out in great attendance. The food and music was awesome. Thank you families and staff for a wonderful event.

  • Jennifer Pavelka
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Wouldn't even give this place one star if possible. Great place if you want your lived one to go downhill fast. Hospice is all they talk about. They even talk to people who visited my Mom, not knowing who they were, started talking about her medical issues with them. So no medical privacy kept for patients. My Mom for medical reasons was moved to a private room. I asked about her things, they said they were in storage and they would get them. Never did get them. Moved my Mom to another home and all they could say is do you have receipts for her things that are missing? I have pictures of them in her room there, not good enough. She couldn't be at this place for 2 days without being sent to a hospital. Funny how she hasn't been to the hospital once since moving her to another home. Left the hospital with 7 wounds, 2 days later Sebo's calls saying she has 12 wounds and 2 are really bad. Funny how almost all her wounds are gone at the new home. I got calls 2-3 times a week telling me to do hospice. Nurses stopped me and my Mom's visitors all the time wanting us to do hospice. New nursing home said she doesn't need hospice. The doctor from there allowed my Mom to starve 4 days in the hospital since I was out of town and she failed a swallow test. It took me questioning her not getting food when I was at the hospital to find all this out. Doctor's excuse was I wasn't at the hospital when he was there. Couldn't pick up a phone and call? Everytime she went to the hospital, except one, the emergency room said she was filthy and dehydrated. Bottom line, if you even remotely care about your loved one, take them somewhere else.

  • Larry Taylor
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    My 78 yr old uncle was a patient there in October and November and had favorable thoughts about the facility and staff as a whole. He thought it was a clean facility and didn't object to being there. I highly recommend this facility for your loved ones.

  • Nancy Bakker
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    My mom has been a resident at Sebo's for 10 months now. The nursing staff & administration are very friendly & helpful. The activities department have something going on frequently to keep my mom busy & to also keep her alert. Very good place!!

About Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMajor Hospital
Ownership TypeGovernment - City
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1992 (27 years)
Capacity138
Residents103
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 14, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

82.1%
87.6%
87.6%
87.6%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
72.2%
81.9%
79.6%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
35.0%
23.8%
14.8%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.4%
14.3%
15.1%
15.4%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.6%
10.7%
9.0%
10.4%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.2%
13.3%
12.5%
9.0%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.1%
7.1%
9.5%
14.8%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.1%
7.8%
4.4%
3.1%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.3%
3.2%
11.9%
9.5%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
5.6%
2.2%
4.1%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
0.0%
1.4%
2.5%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

45.5%
48.0%
55.8%
49.0%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.3%
53.1%
53.1%
53.1%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.0%
0.9%
1.9%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places