Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Hobart
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Takes 15 minutes to call my dad, keep getting transfered. No phones in residents rooms. Rehab center my but they have not done one thing to help him, and every time I get there he's always waiting on his pain medicine. Half the staff acts like they care and the rest just don't and are very rude on the phone and hang up before you can ask a question. The rooms are worse than bad hospital rooms, needs much improvement.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My father was put here due to his declining health from Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's, so because of behavioral issues, brought on from this disease, no other facility would take him or had available space for him, at that time. I was very scared about the facility and the nature at which the patients had to go through their days here. Old nasty beds and decrepit furniture and not enough trained staff to attend to them, as well. As soon as my father was able to be assessed to move out of there by another facility, he was taken out of there. And to top things off, upon his release, even after I had given them sufficient time to pack his things, I had to do it myself, while his transport was waiting for him outside. And, to make matters worse, alot of his personal items could not be located. It is sad to see that there are so few good facilities available to care for the increasing needs of Alzheimer's patients and other concerns of the elderly. A facility is only as good as it's staff. Stay away from this one.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Doing my clinical rotation here and the care being given is horrific. Nothing done by procedure. Residents sit in urine and feces all day. The handling for transfers are far from gentle. I've yet to meet the director or any admin...they just let anyone come in. I would NEVER work here or refer anyone here. The staff is ghetto.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Sebo's nursing home cited by feds for poor performance!!! Do not go to this GHETTO nursing him!!!This place isn't suitable for wild animals. I pulled my grandmother out of this facility after 4 weeks and a trip to the E.R. They promised us they would take good care of her. LIES, LIES, LIES The overwhelming smell of human feces is nausiating and HORRIFIC. The charge nurse lied to me several times and was very disrespectful to my grandmother. They abused and drugged her up everyday. This place needs to close! Why are they still in business.DO NOT GO HERE!!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father in law has been there for rehab this year... he loved it so much and made so many friends. This is where you go for care. Period.

About Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMajor Hospital
Ownership TypeGovernment - City
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity138
Residents103
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 21, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

May 6, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive notice to the resident before a room or roommate change.

September 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

June 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.

April 13, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sebo's Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.6%
82.1%
82.1%
82.1%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.4%
87.4%
87.9%
84.5%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.0%
-
48.0%
40.9%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8%
18.8%
19.4%
17.5%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.3%
14.7%
14.0%
18.7%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.5%
7.3%
9.3%
11.6%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3%
9.9%
14.3%
14.6%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.5%
3.4%
7.6%
3.0%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.1%
8.0%
4.7%
5.0%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
10.4%
9.0%
11.6%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4%
4.0%
1.9%
4.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
3.9%
1.9%
1.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8%
3.2%
1.4%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

50.0%
58.3%
55.8%
55.3%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.6%
63.3%
63.3%
63.3%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.0%
13.8%
0.0%
-
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.0%
3.2%
2.7%
2.9%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places