Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Eagle Valley Meadows

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Indianapolis Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Matt Mize
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Staff does not care about patient care. Found my loved one asleep in a wheelchair covered in her own feces. She has somehow managed to "fall" multiple times.

  • Crystal Logan
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Please do Not put your loved ones here in rehabilitation center my husband fell 7 times in 5 days just showed up he had blood on his mouth and eyes were matted he could barely see I took him out I got him in the car he was so thirsty he was choking on water trying to drink so fast. He said he was cussed out for wanting to use the bathroom. So sad

  • G Fur
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Do not put your loved one here, I would give them 1/2 a star if I could. This place had abused my loved one and intentionally Mis-filed the police report as a missing item instead of a battery and robbery!!! First off, here is a big warning sign, they have no snacks or water even for patients to have on weekends and evenings, so everyone has to starve if you don't have a stash or anloaved one to help you out. Second of all they open the mail and read/fish through things before the patient ever even gets it, which is ironic because they never opened a box of chocolates for my loved ones birthday that sat next to them for over a month, when they lost almost 30lbs in 5 months. This place does have a few wonderful Nurses and Nurses aids, unfortunately just a few though. This place is a nightmare, my loved one was neglected horribly, when they were found deceased, the autopsy had confirmed that it was at least 10 hours before the nurse even noticed they had passed, it's was a nightmare! Part of the problem here is no organization or communication between shifts, people go all day sitting in their own waste, while 2 people do all the work there is always 2-4 people ignoring or sitting on their behinds, and it's usually the nights and weekend where things fall through the cracks. There simply are not enough caring people that work (especially nights /weekends) to make this place acceptable. Management does not motivate or care for the few amazing staff members that do work hard and it makes this place difficult to be reliable care for a loved one as a result. Under no circumstances is it ok to shame, scream or hit someone who is dying, that's just part of being a decent human being, but I've seen it done here.

  • Ayinke Dads
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    First impression as you entering....This facility smells awesome...plus they are well staffed...Good facility i must say.

  • Willene Owens
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    They have been a great facility for my grandparents.

About Eagle Valley Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 6, 1987 (32 years)
Capacity114
Residents110
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Eagle Valley Meadows

Eagle Valley Meadows was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 22, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain comfortable sound levels.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssess in a timely manner the resident when the resident enters the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCompletely assess the resident at least every twelve months.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Eagle Valley Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.1%
93.3%
93.2%
93.2%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.9%
94.6%
93.6%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.8%
73.7%
71.1%
65.6%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.8%
13.6%
12.5%
12.5%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.2%
30.5%
24.6%
10.4%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.6%
13.8%
12.5%
11.1%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.7%
16.1%
14.0%
21.7%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
10.9%
9.8%
8.6%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
1.4%
1.4%
3.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
-
5.9%
-
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
61.9%
52.7%
37.2%
32.9%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
5.4%
3.3%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
2.1%
1.1%
1.1%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
1.8%
0.0%
0.7%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

76.7%
66.7%
55.4%
32.6%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
63.1%
64.0%
64.0%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.5%
62.4%
70.3%
74.6%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.0%
5.0%
-
-
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
0.6%
1.4%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places