Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lakeview Manor

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Indianapolis Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • madison spivey
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    this place has been nothing but good to me and my family. My dad was enrolled in this program and they had him in and out in 3 weeks with a fabulous recovery. I have also had my mother here living long term and she loves it. I recommend this place for anyone who cares about a loved one.

  • Jessi
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    ZERO STARS! NEVER be a candidate for a position here! The staff and management are very rude and apathetic. The environment is TOXIC in my opinion! In my personal (dismal) encounter with them, they all had stink faces and attitudes. (Very hard to even look at them with a strait face! LOL) They will waste your time, and then treat you horribly. Don't even bother!! I feel very sorry for the residents!!

  • Kyana Bellamy
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    This place is nasty. They have some nasty people that works in the kitchen. Not all.The manager is a desk receptionist and never worked in the kitchen before and scared to say anything about what goes on the the kitchen to the staff. She cooks food with no gloves on and has cuts in her hands and won't use the soap. These are some of the condition of the kitchen. I feel sorry for these poor old people. They tried to feed them undone meatloaf. Milk cartons floating in water overnight. A lot of people with deep bed sores. They are way under staff. Alot of falls and disrespectful staff front desk and nursing.

  • Nat M
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    PLEASE!!!! PLEASE!!!! PLEASE!!!!! Don't I will repeat DON'T ever work nor have your love one come to this poor place of business. The head department is rude, pretend to be friendly but their not. They only put on a front when state is in the building or when they're trying to get families to live there. They do not care about their employees because they talks to them nasty and demands them to do unethical things. They can't keep any staff because of how management talks to them. They always working short staff and they expect one nurse or one or two aides to take care of 30 to 40 residents by themselves and how in the world can you call that good patient care. That place needs to get management out of there. And then there are workers who are working there that don't have the correct license to be working in their field in that facility. State need to do a thorough investigation in all departments up there.

  • Christina Scott
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Used to have to go there while working for an unrelated medical transport company. Aides never seemed to possess any kind of awareness. I would show up for an appointment that had been scheduled weeks prior, only to recieve a blank stare from the Aides, and have to go get the patient ready myself, though I wasn't employed there. Because, they were too busy looking for the individual to blame rather than assure the patient made it to the appointment on time. I have also had an Aide slam her hands on her desk at me in a threatening manner and scream in my face, because she lacked the basic comprehension skills to process the idea that she was mistaken, and the day I was standing in front of her was the day that the facility arranged the transport. I showed her the paperwork, and she threw it at me. Super professional, right? Patients were consistantly dirty, reeked of waste, had food caked to thier clothes and faces, with filthy equipment, and generally unhappy. I have been screamed at by other staff here for asking for something as basic as making sure my patient had lunch while they would be gone all day at appointments. It got to a point where I refused to have a thing to do with them. I have no idea how these people tolerate the rampant incompetence here. Also: I am a CNA in school for RN, now. I do this job daily. It is challenging, but if you are willing to step away from your phone, and think about why you are really there, it is rewarding and impactful. If you can stay organized, it isn't hard, just time consuming some times. And knowing all of this- I wouldn't send my pet rock here.

About Lakeview Manor

General Information

Legal Business NameWitham Memorial Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 2, 1968 ()
Capacity184
Residents88
Percent Occupied48%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lakeview Manor

Lakeview Manor was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 27, 2017 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

March 10, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

January 13, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$39,280 fine
JFewImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
JFewImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
JFewImmediate JeopardyHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
JFewImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

July 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lakeview Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
100.0%
96.6%
98.8%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
47.6%
33.3%
29.0%
40.0%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.0%
27.7%
29.4%
35.5%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.9%
14.0%
17.6%
18.0%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.4%
21.4%
22.8%
20.3%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.9%
17.8%
16.7%
10.6%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.4%
13.3%
8.1%
13.1%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.7%
11.5%
9.1%
15.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
24.3%
26.3%
23.2%
31.7%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.0%
9.5%
16.9%
19.7%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.9%
7.7%
8.1%
4.8%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
7.6%
5.7%
5.9%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
1.1%
2.8%
5.5%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.1%
80.6%
68.8%
74.5%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.2%
90.3%
90.3%
90.3%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
55.0%
-
-
44.4%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.5%
0.0%
3.6%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.2%
12.9%
10.4%
7.9%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places