Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rosegate Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Indianapolis
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Anita Giddings
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I have nothing but compliments for everyone at Rosegate. They treat their residents with care, compassion and dignity.

  • Concerned Caregiver
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Great place

  • Larry Hotseller
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My family member was in there please do not send any body there they don't care about the people it was funny but the better business Bureau was there and they act like they care but when they left about a hour later a bunch of call lights where going off business as usual please don't send a family member THERE

  • Gigi woods
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    HORRIBLE PLACE THEY TREATED MY.MOM LIKE CRAP PLEASE DON'T PUT YOUR RELATIVES IN THIS HORRIBLE PLACE!!!!

  • Colleenie Weenie
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Grandfather was there for a week. Had several concerns and 1 trio back to hospital. He will not be returning.

About Rosegate Village

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 6, 2006 (11 years)
Capacity150
Residents141
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rosegate Village

Rosegate Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 1, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

July 6, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionQuickly tell the resident's doctor the results of laboratory tests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

May 20, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rosegate Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 60min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

73.5%
84.3%
84.3%
84.3%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1%
98.2%
93.5%
98.1%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.4%
69.4%
75.9%
74.2%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.2%
20.7%
23.2%
23.5%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.0%
18.8%
20.4%
16.2%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
7.1%
8.9%
9.4%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.2%
6.7%
9.3%
7.4%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.5%
4.0%
6.2%
2.4%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2%
10.7%
2.8%
5.7%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
4.6%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
25.0%
43.6%
34.3%
48.5%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
2.7%
1.9%
2.9%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
4.4%
3.7%
2.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9%
2.7%
2.8%
1.9%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

87.9%
89.8%
87.0%
86.8%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.1%
78.3%
78.3%
78.3%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.5%
73.1%
76.9%
84.2%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.5%
7.6%
7.0%
2.8%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.3%
2.0%
3.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
1.0%
0.6%
0.5%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places