Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rosewalk Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Indianapolis
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Dennis Ciurej
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My wife was recently in the rehab center for a month. While the staff was helpful and attentive, any requests we made, while passed on to the staff, was ignored by anyone above them. My wife was given 22 units of Lantis when her doctor had prescribed 33. She told that to the staff, but nothing was ever done. As a result, her blood sugar spiked quite often over 400. She says the staff recorded it but nothing was done. She called her doctor and was told they had no control or influence over the center. I received a call in the afternoon last Tuesday and was told that our insurance ran out. I was asked whether we would appeal or leave. We had to leave that day. I asked the person on the phone how much it cost to stay, she didn't know. I asked her to check and call me back. Instead of calling me, my wife was told the price was 220/day. She told me she had one more appointment with her therapist and had to arrange for oxygen. I told her to pay for the next three days if she wished to. She paid the next morning and was THEN told therapy was not included. She was tested for oxygen Wednesday at 1:30 and no one told her the results until Thursday. At that point we were so disgusted that she came home. We were never refunded for the lost day.

  • shiann weeden
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This place is horrible.. Very understaffed..the supervisers and the CNA are pitiful..the supervision is terrible.. THIS PLACE NEEDS TO B CLOSED DOWN..NASTY STINKY PLACE!! DONT BRING UR LOVED ONES HERE!!

  • Chenise Malone
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    My father was placed here for hospice care. His end of life journey was not at all pleasurable @ Rosewalk. Hospice is supposed to be a time of comfort and care from caregivers. My family feels cheated because we did not have a good experience as most families do when they have a loved one in hospice care. The staff is unprofessional, they have tattoos and piercings and look at you like a rival gang member. My family has walked in on our dad in respiratory distress, genitalia exposed, flat on his back with tube feedings running and his face in the bedrails. Each of these accounts were witnessed on separate occasions! Many times, my dad was left in his room with the door shut. He cannot walk or talk. We rely on the staff to make sure he is comfortable during his transition from this earth. My family feels that hospice to Rosewalk means, "We do nothing for the patient". He is clearly neglected! Mr. Link, the administrator is aware. However, his efforts to change what is happening to my dad are not effective. DO NOT SEND YOU LOVED ONE TO THIS FACILITY. SPARE YOUR LOVED ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Lisa Wintler-Cox
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Operated like a money mill for the owners. Extremely understaffed at night. I feel certain their bad care contributed to the death of my Father. Dad chose them because they were near the hospital if he had a problem. He ended up having several serious episodes and after hitting the button over and over I had to go out and find someone each time. I began to notice that the night staff would just let the buzzers go without answering them...ever. That's right, they NEVER answered the patient calls. There were barely any of them there to get the work done that needed to be done. My Dad had an episode after I went home and before my brother came and passed away. Overall, most of the staff seemed untrained and poorly briefed as to my Dad's condition. Wish we'd gone back to Miller Manor.

  • Devin Cox
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    This place is horrible. My father passed away in there due to low supervison and no proper care. My ex husband's grandmother wasn't propped up correctly. She was given a peice of food and it was lodge in her throat and she died due to choking....

About Rosewalk Village

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County
Ownership TypeGovernment - City/County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 10, 1989 (29 years)
Capacity161
Residents146
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rosewalk Village

Rosewalk Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 15, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

January 28, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.

October 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

June 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get x-rays and other tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

January 9, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

December 10, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rosewalk Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.1%
66.7%
67.7%
69.5%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.4%
20.8%
18.0%
18.3%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.2%
12.0%
13.8%
11.8%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.5%
16.5%
13.7%
12.1%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.8%
13.2%
4.9%
12.5%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.1%
1.3%
3.4%
0.0%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.4%
11.5%
6.7%
12.1%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
7.8%
2.2%
5.5%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
43.9%
36.8%
24.2%
44.2%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
1.0%
1.9%
2.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
2.3%
0.8%
3.1%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.7%
99.6%
88.7%
76.9%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.7%
73.9%
74.2%
68.7%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.9%
4.3%
1.9%
5.3%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
2.1%
2.4%
2.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
0.5%
1.0%
1.2%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places