Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rosewalk Village At Lafayette

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Lafayette
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Worst nursing home ever. Residents are not taken care of ever. I was a cook, I covered up to 3 shifts bcuz we were so understaffed. Kitchen manager would pull in the janitor to help rather than roll her sleeves up and help. Here's a tip I learned, co sign for the boss to get a new car and you can get a raise and promotion. Break your back to help them but if they have to cover a weekend day for you, they fire you. The ED Nate, is a coward. Wont fix or attempt to fix anything, they treat residents that report them better than other residents. Place is a joke. Ive had 4 family members as residents and that was all fours last resting place....?. Do not work there, literally watched a CNA Tell a resident go f@&k themselves. Saw a nurse pull off her sock and scratch her foot, then served food without washing up. Disgusting, horrible and lace all around. -10 stars!!!

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Think twice before sending a loved one to this facility. Every time we walked in the door, it smelled of urine and other odors. First night my son was here, we were in process of asking nurse about his meds. They were all messed up and she was short and rude to us. Facility is grossly under staffed. Food offered to residents was terrible. My son was offered waffles, bacon, and green beans for supper! I am glad he is out of this place!

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I had a very good time with the nurses, OT, and PT staff. I had 2 pair of pant that costs me around 60 dollars a peace. They said I would get a replacement pants at the same cost. I got pants that don't fit. If you can have family wash you clothes do it. This was the second time there in a few months and I seen a big change in treatment from the staff.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    This is the worse place ever. I have worked in nursing homes over ten years. Never have a seen such uncaring and ruse people in my life. They didnt even care or do anything to help my loved one who was in there. If I never would of found him who knows what would happen. Please do not ever put or let a loved go to this trash dump.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Absolute worst place in the entire world for patients and staff alike. Alzehimers unit IS GOOD tho. 1st floor looks nice, but wait until you see the upstairs. There are tons of patients with very little staff, (unless state is expected to be there) wouldn't take my dog here. Amazing overworked, and underpaid staff tho!

About Rosewalk Village At Lafayette

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 8, 1970 (47 years)
Capacity141
Residents113
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rosewalk Village At Lafayette

Rosewalk Village At Lafayette
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 28, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

April 1, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

June 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

February 10, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$26,100 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rosewalk Village At Lafayette require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.0%
57.8%
46.5%
48.9%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.8%
29.8%
24.4%
27.8%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.6%
19.8%
11.9%
14.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.9%
6.1%
5.2%
5.7%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.1%
18.3%
8.3%
9.7%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7%
6.4%
1.2%
1.1%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8%
6.8%
5.0%
5.6%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7%
6.5%
5.6%
11.6%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
64.2%
71.7%
68.8%
72.5%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.8%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
0.7%
1.4%
2.7%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.8%
97.9%
96.8%
90.9%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.4%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.7%
57.0%
56.0%
51.6%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.5%
9.5%
19.0%
13.0%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places