Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rolling Hills Healthcare Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. New Albany Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • tonya preston
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I met a few nice employees when visiting my loved one. I believe they left due to coworkers spending to much time going to smoke, taking more than one lunch break, on cellphones and lack of team work. This facility needs remodeled the alarms on the door constantly malfunctions & it's very disturbing. I don't see snacks getting passed out like the place we just toured. In the summer it is extremely hot why not some fruit punch instead of water all the time? I also don't see the shower room used often, its a big beautiful spacious shower room by the way some patients would probably love one if offered. It also has a whirl pool tub!! The Director does a lot for my loved ones! I hope this review helps make a difference not for just my loved one but for all the loved ones in this home. You cant break them up as halls, When it really is there home. Have some dignity& respect to some of those employees always gripping outside my loved ones room about which hall there on.

  • Colin Johnson
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I liked it Okay when my Grandma first went here there were some nice staff but when some of the staff at this place messed with her I didn't like this place at all. If u love ur loved one don't send them here. RIP: Nana?

  • lisa smith
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My son just left there and they treated him with so much kindness and didn't judge him . And he loved the food to lol. Thanks Rolling bills.

  • Sherry Smith
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Director of Nursing & NURSES do a great job! Senior Cna's seek to much praise & egoism, & worried about getting a comment card posted on the wall than the residents. Senior Cna's, Human resources, scheduler all have a bad attitude making it hard for new nurses and aides joining the team.

  • Jenna McDonald
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Just visited Mom for the first time at this facility since being transferred from the hospital. Several of the family were ill with the flu so were not able to see her for the first month. Mom is being very well cared for and the nurses and aides are very attentive. As soon as we arrived they brought extra chairs into her room and also took time to speak with me on the way out despite it being a busy time of shift. It smelled clean. It does need a face lift. The only faults I found were cosmetic. I would keep Mom here long term if her insurance would allow. I am an RN with experience in Long Term Care and can tell when patients are being neglected. These aides and nurses are trying their very best and paying attention despite being busy. Those I encountered were there because they loved working with their patients and didn't seem to just be there for a paycheck.

About Rolling Hills Healthcare Center

General Information

Legal Business NameColumbus Regional Hospital
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 1, 1993 (27 years)
Capacity115
Residents109
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rolling Hills Healthcare Center

Rolling Hills Healthcare Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 15, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

May 23, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rolling Hills Healthcare Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 30min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
96.7%
96.7%
96.7%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.8%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.0%
56.5%
52.0%
58.3%
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.0%
20.9%
28.2%
32.9%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.6%
13.2%
19.1%
21.4%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.3%
24.7%
17.8%
25.6%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.5%
12.1%
20.0%
25.0%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.5%
9.6%
9.9%
6.5%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
8.5%
5.6%
2.9%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
17.3%
11.4%
2.6%
3.4%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
2.4%
1.2%
1.1%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2%
8.4%
4.8%
1.1%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.8%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.6%
88.2%
94.3%
98.8%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.2%
63.9%
63.9%
63.9%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.3%
58.3%
61.8%
50.1%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.3%
0.0%
5.4%
4.0%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
5.7%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.0%
1.9%
0.9%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places