Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Parker Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Parker City
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Wanda Dytmire
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

About Parker Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRiverview Hospital
Ownership TypeGovernment - City/County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity87
Residents75
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Parker Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

Parker Health Care & Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 22, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

June 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Parker Health Care & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.4%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.8%
65.7%
63.6%
73.1%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
17.2%
16.7%
17.9%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.0%
11.4%
6.5%
15.7%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.4%
15.6%
15.3%
12.9%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.5%
21.1%
9.8%
12.7%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
6.1%
4.3%
2.8%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
1.6%
6.7%
9.5%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
1.8%
5.7%
1.8%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.7%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
4.7%
3.3%
11.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
1.5%
1.7%
3.2%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
2.6%
1.6%
1.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.5%
90.9%
97.1%
97.1%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.5%
90.9%
90.9%
90.9%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.1%
64.2%
71.0%
67.0%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.0%
14.0%
9.3%
3.6%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places