Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rawlins House Health & Living Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Indiana (IN)
  4. Pendleton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This place sux I was admitted due to an amputation and couldn't be on my own I took pain pill at 11am from the hospital then taking to rawlins by ambulance didn't get pain pill till 5am sat in pain was given Tylenol then waited 3 1/2 hrs USE THE bathroom but could hear nurses in the hall talking and joking so finally called my friend to take me out of there and to find another facility

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    They dont feed my grandmother. She can no longer use her hands and they know this. She fell two weeks ago and the EMT literally said it was a fire trap due to the over crowding. They know how to follow the law. They just chose not to. They don't care. Unfortunately if you dont have money, this is where the state sends your loved ones. Please look for other options. My grandmother is also deaf and no one there signs or even writes to her. If They have time to be on their phones and lay on the beds then they have time to write on a piece of paper to ask my grandmother if she is okay or hungry. Literally makes me sick and my family visit every day for hours. Please chose wisely.

  • ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    I worked at the Rawlins House for a little over two months. In my time there I heard and seen it all.The nursing staff is very understaffed due to budget so residents did not receive the proper care. The turn around rate for the nursing staff was huge due to they do not pay any of their employees well enough except administrative staff. I always walked by and heard staff talking crap about patients and I could hear it so I know residents and their families could. The administrator is amazing but none of the other staff is. My opinion, I would never bring my parents or grandparents to this facility.

  • ★★★★★ 7 years ago

    I came into this facility for the first time on 9/20 and I was amazed by the kind, warm and open welcome I received. I was waiting for an appointment, and as I did so I was greeted by multiple smiling faces as the Rawlins House employees asked if they could do anything to assist me. I then took a tour of the Rawlins House and Fall Creek Campus. I made sure to look at the faces of the residents and staff as I was walking around. They were happy faces and seemed to be very well taken care of - it was refreshing. Not only that, but I was also pleasantly surprised by the fact that the building was very clean and smelled good! After my tour and assessment of this haeven, I am certain that when my loved one needs more care that I can give, the professionals at Rawlins House and Fall Creek will provide amazing care.

  • ★★★★★ 8 years ago

    This place is the bottom of the bottom. This place basically as far as I am concerned with their no caring staff killed my mother. My mother was in this facility and I would talk to her via phone as I lived in Calif at the time and was not able to be present to supervise her care. I spoke with my mother and she complained they were not keeping her clean but then when she told me she was gotten out of bed so they could change the sheets and she fell and felt she broke her wrist and advised the staff. The staff took no action other than to give her an asprin. No xray, nothing. It was not until she fell more ill than she was when admitted to this place (originally admitted for rehab only I might add) that she was transported to a hospital in which they found she did in fact break her wrist. I STRONGLY suggest that no one solicit the services of this place. If you love your elder then do not put them in Rawlings House in Pendleton Indiana. The staff is unprofessional. The administrator is only about making that buck and uses the place as death housing for the money. They had one housekeeper that worked there along with other employees that was as good as gold and because she had too much time which was costing the administrator more than minimum wage to keep her they let her go with a lame excuse. Imagine that, how cheap. This lady had over 20 years with the facility. Probably the only employee that really cared. Sandra H

About Rawlins House Health & Living Community

General Information

Legal Business NameRiverview Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 4, 1990 (28 years)
Capacity110
Residents97
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rawlins House Health & Living Community

Rawlins House Health & Living Community
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 7, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

June 8, 2016 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

September 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

May 18, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rawlins House Health & Living Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.2%
97.5%
97.5%
97.5%
93.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.1%
96.2%
94.8%
93.6%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
32.0%
-
-
34.8%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.6%
17.6%
17.3%
15.3%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.6%
15.8%
10.5%
16.6%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.3%
15.8%
13.2%
12.8%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.2%
13.2%
21.4%
10.3%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
1.5%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9%
3.8%
6.6%
9.1%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.0%
5.5%
9.8%
7.8%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
5.8%
5.6%
2.8%
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3%
3.8%
0.0%
1.3%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
3.8%
2.6%
2.6%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.5%
2.2%
1.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

83.0%
76.5%
64.7%
54.9%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.2%
90.8%
90.8%
90.7%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.4%
70.3%
52.3%
49.7%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.5%
11.5%
7.1%
7.2%
15.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
1.1%
1.2%
2.6%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places