Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Ashford Place Health Campus

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Indiana
  3. Shelbyville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sarah Davis
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Ashford Place has a wonderful home-like, welcoming, and comfortable setting for those with senior healthcare needs. The staff is friendly, helpful, and treat the residents like family. The atmosphere is always warm and lively. They have the most fun "Happy Hour" event for their residents on Friday afternoons! It is convenient that they have different care levels such as Independent Living, Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing. I highly recommend Ashford Place for a loved one or for yourself!

  • Sylvia Spurling
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My mother lived in the Assisted Living section of Ashford Place for about 8 years. She did have a couple of brief stays on the medical side. She received wonderful care. The staff was very kind and loving to her. Toward the end of her life (she died at 102) she probably needed a little more help than most of the residents. The staff went out of their way to help her because they knew of her wish to stay in her "home". My mother in law is currently a resident in AL at Ashford, and she went there because of mother's positive experience . I would not hesitate to give Ashford Place a high recommendation.

  • Mary Lux
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Ashford Place is the only senior living community in Shelby County that offers a full continuum of care. Independent Living in the condo-style villas. assisted living, memory care, short-term rehab and long term care. I would not have returned to my position at Ashford Place if I didn't feel strongly that the campus and staff provide needed services for the seniors in our community. When asked if I had to would I place my parents here my answer is truthfully, yes.

  • Sherryl Alexander
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I like the fact that everyone knows my loved one's name. I am assured that everyone has her best interests at heart. My concerns are addressed in a timely and respectful way.

  • Karen Herr-Hembree
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Have visited this facility twice in the past couple of months. Staff is wonderful. Food is great. Facility is clean. The facility smells clean unlike others that I've encountered the past couple of years.

About Ashford Place Health Campus

General Information

Legal Business NameHancock Regional Hospital
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 16, 2004 (14 years)
Capacity68
Residents55
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Ashford Place Health Campus

Ashford Place Health Campus was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Indiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

September 17, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Ashford Place Health Campus require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.8%
95.9%
95.9%
95.9%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.7%
97.4%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.0%
68.2%
-
-
51.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.8%
10.5%
15.8%
14.7%
22.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.4%
8.9%
10.8%
10.6%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
11.6%
4.8%
10.5%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.8%
2.6%
26.3%
5.9%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.6%
13.6%
2.4%
5.6%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
2.6%
2.7%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
13.4%
6.4%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
2.4%
2.4%
0.0%
8.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2%
2.3%
2.3%
5.1%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.7%
98.5%
95.0%
89.7%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.4%
91.2%
91.2%
91.2%
80.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.9%
63.5%
73.5%
72.7%
66.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.6%
9.1%
22.0%
12.0%
13.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
1.7%
1.3%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.3%
1.0%
0.6%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places