Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Good Samaritan Society - Ellsworth Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Ellsworth
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Good Samaritan Society - Ellsworth Village

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 1, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity74
Residents58
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Good Samaritan Society - Ellsworth Village

Good Samaritan Society - Ellsworth Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 25, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$19,403 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 2 days
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
HSomeActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

June 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,763 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

January 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

July 1, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Good Samaritan Society - Ellsworth Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 60min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.3%
96.7%
96.7%
96.7%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.6%
51.7%
55.6%
53.8%
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.5%
13.0%
12.7%
17.0%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
27.1%
10.7%
8.4%
4.6%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.8%
25.9%
25.0%
27.8%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.1%
15.1%
20.4%
17.3%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3%
8.6%
5.4%
5.2%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
7.1%
0.0%
1.8%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.3%
0.0%
4.2%
4.3%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
1.8%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.9%
21.4%
10.3%
7.1%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
1.8%
1.7%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened