Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Garden Valley Retirement Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Garden City Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • mia horn
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Lots of patients (guests). When you have a family member that needs care, it is a great place.

  • Alvaro Guzman
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Looks like they take good care of the elderly here!

  • HeAvEn ScEnT
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    This is my personal experience with East wing, Financial Administration and Anita in Admissions. Not the whole building in general.... Staff was so friendly BEFORE my mom entered into this facility but once she was moved in things changed BIG time! I regret so much placing my mom here. I Don't recommend this place at all. My mom has a very small monthly income but yet when she moved in late in the month she still was charged the full months rent. When I asked about why Anita told me they discussed it with me before my mom moving in....lie #1. Then we were told my mom can have visitations with her dog and that I can bring it to her often to stay the day. I have stopped taking the dog because there was nothing but drama when I did take her. First time I dropped the dog off I got a phone call from Anita stating I couldn't drop off the dog until we got shot records (understandable) but never was even told about having to provide them. Anita told me she would call and get the animal shelter to get them faxed.....okay awesome!!! Second time I dropped the dog off (assuming Anita made that call) I received a call right away stating the dog stunk, her tags were expired and I still hadn't provided shot records :/ .... Seriously? First off Anita told me she would call the shelter. I called the vet asking why the dogs tags were expired (note: there is only a tag number and vets phone number on the dogs tags) she reassured me the tags were good until June 2018......lie #2 .... When I called back to ask where they got the information on the dogs tags Anita got very defensive and started getting very rude with me. Wow talk about perfessionalism here. I never got a straight answer from her except they didn't have time to call the vet......okay so then why was i told the tags were expired??? Crazy!!! I have 3 dogs of my own plus trying to take care of a stray dog that was abandoned and my moms dog....i dont have time to give the dog a bath before i drop her off and she's an inside dog who goes outside during nice days so she's gonna get dirty lol wow is all I can say about that! But hey they did give her a bath and she smelled wonderful :) oh but now was told I had to bath her before bringing her again smh....My mom is in the first stages of dementia and has a really hard time remembering....there was a few incidents when I came to visit my mom and her soiled clothes were piling up. I asked staff about it and was told that my mom needed to put them in a bag and bring them out to the hamper.... seriously??? My mom HAS DEMENTIA!!!! Her room smells like soiled clothes because they just pile up in a corner. If i didn't live so far I would just wash her clothes. Late one night in the evening my mom called me trying to tell me something but I didn't understand her (mild stroke makes her hard to understand) so she handed the phone to the nurse to help relay the message but all was told to me is that my mom needed to stop taking people's sodas from the fridge which upset my mom for days and my mom HAS DEMENTIA!!!! This was told to me right in front of my mom which upset me so much. There is so much more that needs to be said here but it's already so long. I would just never ever ever recommend sending any one here in my personal opinion. I will end with this though....not everyone In this facility are bad, because there is some amazing amazing workers that truly love the residents here.

  • Caleigh Knight
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Large place that accommodates for its occupants. Kind staff that is helpful to the elderly. Great environment, even has a beautiful cage with some canarys inside. My high school choir sang carols there and the staff seemed very tentative with the elders and even joined in when some of the elders did too. Knew someone who worked there and she said nothing but good things about doing so.

  • Beth Laudert
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Their staff is always kind and helpful to the residents!

About Garden Valley Retirement Village

General Information

Legal Business NameGarden Valley Retirement Village, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 6, 1988 (30 years)
Capacity82
Residents73
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Garden Valley Retirement Village

Garden Valley Retirement Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 8, 2017 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$92,981 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 104 days
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

November 16, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$63,403 fine
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaint+InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Garden Valley Retirement Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.1%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.4%
94.9%
91.1%
77.8%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.9%
63.6%
57.1%
-
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.8%
28.1%
23.6%
31.4%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.1%
21.2%
18.9%
20.8%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.7%
23.2%
26.4%
25.5%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.5%
20.0%
16.4%
22.0%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.9%
17.5%
15.1%
14.8%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5%
8.5%
2.4%
2.3%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
4.5%
5.0%
6.5%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5%
13.2%
13.3%
11.9%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
5.3%
9.4%
0.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2%
10.2%
7.1%
7.4%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
0.0%
1.5%
6.1%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.5%
74.6%
57.8%
30.0%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.6%
70.1%
70.1%
70.1%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.3%
57.9%
-
-
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.2%
9.8%
8.2%
14.9%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
5.4%
2.1%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
2.3%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places