Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital Ltcu

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Gardner
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Trong T
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    The staff members are rude taunting and look down on me as well as treat me with disrespect and harrassments I will be reporting them to the health care system once I get out. Tonight they made threats and false accusations.

  • Kristen Kepner
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Huge Shout out to Greg and the Meadowbrook team!!! I have been a social worker in the field doing placements for 20 years. I need to say that this has been one of the easiest facilities to work with. Their communication and dedication to helping others is awe inspiring. They fought tooth and nail to make this placement happen knowing that he would not be a big money maker for their facility. It was clear from the beginning that they truly has the pt and families best interests in the forefront. If I get the opportunity to refer to their facility again, I know that it will be a great experience.

  • Lan Nguyen
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The only redeeming quality about this place is the few therapists, a few cnas and 1,2 nurses who are actually good-hearted and do their jobs and treat the patient like a human being. The rest are grumpy, rude, hurtful people who have no manners, morals and disrespect, treat visitors and patients like scum. I was outside and overheard these two staff who came outside to talk crap with f words left and right. Then proceed to call me a creep and talked to me like i was a criminal because i was outside walking my dog. Then they giggled and laughed in whispers once i told them i was here to visit a family member but sleep in my car at night in the parking lot because home is hours away. This is not an uncommon incident, many times staff make rude remarks about visitors/patients not to their face but to their co workers but try to act like they're nice people. Higher up staff are also rude, especially the administrator John Scott, total biggot and arrogant and just a total a hole, but he'll be nice to your face too and if your family is around. Basically this place, you get some good staff, and the rest if they think you don't matter or not someone important, they will treat you like dirt. Meadowbrook lost more than half the clothes i packed for my husband and took the things i brought for him. When we try to get those things back, they tell us we're not allowed to go look for the lost clothes in the basement laundry because 'guests aren't allowed down there', but no staff is willing to go look for us either. The second week, i came visit my husband his bed smelled like pee and when i asked someone to change the sheets, they look mad like i was in the wrong for asking for new sheets. I'm not a particularly picky person but Meadowbrook staff had me extremely disappointed than i have ever been in any health care facility and i have been to many hospitals and over 50 times at least. No hospital is perfect and while i do not expect perfection, Meadowbrook's rudeness is outrageous, especially for people who works in a supposedly caring field. The mannerisms are so bad I dread coming to Meadowbrook every minute of the drive i have to make, wondering how i will be treated and what will they be rude to me for this time. If it wasn't for my husband, i would never have come back to this place again. Just be warned, pretty pictures they posted on their websites are the nicest portion of the facility they have. 300 and 400 halls living setting look like nursing homes, depressing. Your loved one is not going to some grand hotel where they're gonna be treated like kings and queens, best you can hope for is they recover fast (and this varies for individuals) so they can leave. I do not believe Meadowbrook is as good as people say it is. And do not be fooled and expect this place to 'fix up' your loved one. They will improve most likely over time but people who credit Meadowbrook for all the healing and progress are naive. All patients need time and their recovery depend on themselves more than anyone else.

  • Rebecca Rhudy
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

  • Michael Hosch
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

About Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital Ltcu

General Information

Legal Business NamePinnacle Health Facilities Xviii Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 26, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity42
Residents33
Percent Occupied79%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital Ltcu

Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital Ltcu
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 13, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

August 10, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$10,010 fine
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

January 30, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive notice to the resident before a room or roommate change.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital Ltcu require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 30min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
95.8%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.5%
12.0%
19.2%
27.3%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
34.8%
18.2%
32.1%
27.0%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.0%
22.7%
20.8%
21.7%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.4%
4.8%
13.6%
28.6%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
11.7%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.0%
4.2%
0.0%
4.0%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7%
0.0%
-
-
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
8.7%
16.0%
4.0%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.0%
4.2%
4.2%
4.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.7%
8.3%
13.4%
12.6%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.3%
96.3%
95.8%
97.3%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
97.5%
97.5%
97.5%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.5%
62.7%
72.0%
74.1%
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
18.5%
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
2.0%
4.2%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.1%
2.3%
2.5%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places