Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Wesley Towers Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Hutchinson
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Wesley Towers Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameWesley Towers, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity160
Residents90
Percent Occupied56%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Wesley Towers Inc

Wesley Towers Inc
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 18, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

March 2, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

April 10, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

November 12, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Wesley Towers Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr 25min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

89.6%
97.9%
97.9%
97.9%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9%
98.9%
98.8%
98.7%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.0%
40.6%
50.0%
39.4%
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
28.6%
23.5%
19.7%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.1%
15.1%
18.3%
31.0%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.9%
20.9%
20.0%
21.8%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.2%
11.8%
10.4%
18.6%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.5%
11.0%
10.5%
10.2%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.8%
11.8%
5.0%
4.0%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.0%
1.8%
4.1%
4.5%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
16.1%
20.3%
8.5%
13.5%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.6%
5.9%
3.8%
6.7%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5%
11.5%
9.9%
10.1%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

72.5%
84.5%
93.1%
94.3%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.9%
86.2%
86.2%
86.2%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.1%
78.6%
82.1%
78.0%
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.5%
13.5%
10.0%
20.0%
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.6%
1.6%
7.9%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened