Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Valley View Senior Life

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Junction City Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • taesha walker
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I've been here 7 years.. all job have ups and down but the reason I stay is because of the residents, my schedule and the director of dining and hospitality..They do a lot of activities with the residents.. They care about there employees family life every time I needed/wanted to do something with my son school related like go on his field trips last minute she would find a way for me to go. Valley View Senior Life has some real good people working there and I consider some of them my family.

  • Regina. Denio
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I love working at valley view I love the residents there

  • Kristin Winn
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    You will be overworked and underpaid. They put myself and 1 other aide to care for 66 residents at least. The entire time I worked there I never met or saw the D.O.N. You communicate via notes under and taped to her door. The residents are wonderful but like a former co worker from here said Valley View turns nice people mean by the way employees are treated and ran into the ground. Absolutely no genuine care for their employees

  • John Bee
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I responded to a job posting on Indeed that only included a basic job description for a shift nurse. I sent them my resume and was told to come for an interview, no other information about the position was offered. When I got to the interview, I was told that I must fill out an application and read the job description before being interviewed. The job description was the same as online verbatim, and still did not state what position, hours, or shift I was applying for. When I told them that I would like to know what job I was applying for before I filled out an application, I got some serious attitude from the staff. I made a few simple but painful inquiries about what shifts were available, told the DON it wouldn't work out, and politely left. When I got home I received a string of unprofessional emails from the Director of Human Resources stating that I should have read the job description before I came to the interview. As I am writing this review, they still haven't updated the job description information. This kind of incompetent and childish behavior of blaming others for your failure is unacceptable for anyone in a management position and directly reflects upon this company as a whole. These are not the type of people you want to work for, or the type of people you want running a care facility for the sake of the residents. On a positive note, I liked the dog.

  • R C
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Staff is not organized. DON is not a team player. Staff is constantly involved or has involved other people in unnecessary drama. Upper management is not out for the best interest of the residences or their employees(lpn/rn/CNA's). Will never employ here again let alone place them on my resume.

About Valley View Senior Life

General Information

Legal Business NameValley View Senior Life LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1981 (39 years)
Capacity100
Residents75
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Valley View Senior Life

Valley View Senior Life was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Valley View Senior Life has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Valley View Senior Life require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
98.4%
96.8%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
67.9%
59.4%
68.8%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.6%
25.8%
28.6%
25.0%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.6%
36.6%
33.9%
32.4%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.3%
18.3%
20.7%
19.3%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.7%
16.7%
18.0%
16.9%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.8%
6.5%
11.3%
13.1%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
7.0%
14.5%
5.0%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4%
4.3%
2.4%
2.2%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.2%
8.1%
9.7%
6.6%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
7.8%
11.1%
6.5%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
2.4%
1.1%
2.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

71.4%
75.7%
62.2%
52.1%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.2%
81.1%
81.1%
81.1%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
17.2%
6.2%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
3.7%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places