Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Covenant Place Of Lenexa Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Lenexa Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Nancy Williams
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My parents have been residents of Assisted Living at WVL for 2 years. From the cleanliness of the facility to the high-quality of staff, there is nothing that I or they would change. It speaks highly of the management team that many of the aides and nurses have been with WVL since it opened. They really do care about the quality of life for their residents. Westchester Village of Lenexa has to be one of the BEST senior living facilities in the country.

  • Margaret Bowker
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father had a lovely stay at Westchester Village following a shoulder fracture. Westchester assisted him with rehabilitation services and provided a beautiful, clean, safe environment for his recovery. He was there for three months and really enjoyed his time there.

  • Kimberly Brake
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    It's amazing how you can come to a new job and everything is "amazing" because of the promises they give to you and then the real truth comes out! It's sad when your ADON calls you into the office and tells you that everyone hates you because you want them to do their job, and are forced to leave because you can't do your job because your DON, and admins don't back you up. I pray they stop doing this to their employees and treat their residents right! This place is a click, from the admins to the nursing staff. Don't let the "new" look fool you.

  • Sandy Gustafson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My experience here was great. First, I felt like all of my caregivers and staff cared about helping me. They knew my name after the first day. There were several different types of staff, i.e., housekeepers,certified care attendants, certified medical attendants, LPNs, RNs, DON, cook, kitchen help, social worker, PT & OT, medical records, etc. They all performed their jobs like clockwork with friendly caring attitudes. If I preferred to have something different, such as when to get up in the morning it was no problem. It was always, "what would work better for you?" It was shocking to think I was going to nursing facility for rehab. I am 64 and feel like 50. I am so thankful my doctors at the hospital suggested I do this this. I believe my healing time was cut in half due to such great care (including food). Thank you all for everything. Many blessings to each of you.

  • Ryan Mathes
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    This place is very fancy, almost like a hotel. I can't comment on how attentive or helpful the staff is seeing as I was there less than an hour. However, it appeared clean and well taken care of.

About Covenant Place Of Lenexa Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameCovenant Place Of Lenexa Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 27, 2013 (7 years)
Capacity34
Residents31
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Covenant Place Of Lenexa Inc

Covenant Place Of Lenexa Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 27, 2016 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 4 days

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Covenant Place Of Lenexa Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
85.0%
84.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
23.8%
20.0%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
10.0%
16.0%
4.0%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
9.5%
-
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
20.0%
4.2%
4.0%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
0.0%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
4.2%
0.0%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
5.0%
4.2%
12.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
5.0%
8.0%
12.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

75.6%
78.8%
83.0%
94.3%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.7%
84.6%
84.6%
84.6%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
64.9%
-
-
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.6%
11.9%
9.4%
4.8%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7%
0.0%
3.4%
4.3%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places