Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Stoneybrook Retirement Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Manhattan
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Mike Hunter
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Great staff, very nice, caring folks

  • Keely Williams
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Worked here for 4 years. Changed administration frequently. State reports are located in the front of every faculty, public is allowed access to see state findings and reportings of any nursing home. I would highly recommend reading these reports.

  • Nellie Baker
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    If Midwest Health Care hasn't gotten rid of Stoneybrook's Assisted Living inept LPN Jennifer Spriggs or the Director of Assisted Living Mary Jo Berg then I wouldn't trust the safety or the accurate reporting on the charts of the residents to the family or the authorities that safeguard resident rights ....I would go to another facility or keep my family member at home. Mary Jo Berg and Jennifer Spriggs thought up the devious plan that to keep their census high on the amount of residents they kept in Assisted Living they would allow Alzheimer residents in the facility and simply charge the residents family &/or Medicaid more money, despite the fact that those dementia residents were combative and attacking other non dementia residents and smearing feces in other residents rooms and in the common areas. The limited amount of staff at the assisted living, who get paid less, are forced to keep track of the whereabouts of wandering dementia residents who belong at a certified Alzheimer unit, which Stoneybrook doesn't have one at all, and these staff are still expected to do the cleaning, serve the meals, do the laundry and answer calls to other resident rooms. Staff would often lose track of the whereabouts of the Alzheimer residents when they were outside on their smoking and iPhone checking breaks and the non dementia residents were left to fend for themselves. Those residents who would protect themselves against a dementia resident were threatened with police action by staff or administration even though administration wouldn't have risked the police seeing what was really going on. A few mistreated residents moved to Meadowlark. Even though Midwest Health care had to fire nearly all previous Assisted Living Directors since it opened, no one from the branch office came in to investigate the conduct of their administrative staff. Alzheimer combativeness to other WASN"T charted by the RCC (Resident Care Coordinator) Jennifer Spriggs because charting this abuse would "fall back on" her and could be used in court against the facility. Decent staff were written off the schedule or discredited and dismissed in other ways that would conceal the actual incidents not brought to the attention of the State Inspectors. This facility is not worth the money or the aggravation.

  • Ashley Garcia
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

About Stoneybrook Retirement Community

General Information

Legal Business NameStoneybrook Nursing Facility Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 25, 1989 (28 years)
Capacity114
Residents58
Percent Occupied51%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Stoneybrook Retirement Community

Stoneybrook Retirement Community was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Stoneybrook Retirement Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
84.2%
84.2%
84.2%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
36.4%
24.5%
47.1%
66.7%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
27.6%
33.3%
28.6%
31.0%
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.2%
35.3%
34.0%
35.6%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.1%
18.5%
28.7%
15.3%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.8%
23.8%
32.5%
29.7%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.6%
14.6%
18.8%
16.7%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.5%
10.3%
10.2%
14.4%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.5%
11.8%
4.1%
6.4%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
12.2%
10.6%
14.6%
17.8%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

73.1%
51.0%
31.7%
18.6%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.2%
51.0%
51.0%
51.0%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.1%
45.3%
-
66.9%
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.2%
17.2%
35.7%
25.6%
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
9.7%
3.7%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places