Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Asbury Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Newton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

About Asbury Park

General Information

Legal Business NameAsbury Park, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity101
Residents92
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Asbury Park

Asbury Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 12, 2017 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$8,125 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

November 5, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain comfortable and safe temperature levels.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Asbury Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 60min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 45min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.6%
99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.9%
91.1%
92.2%
92.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.2%
37.7%
51.8%
45.8%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.5%
10.6%
14.1%
12.7%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.0%
21.0%
14.2%
17.2%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
9.4%
11.8%
12.2%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.2%
14.6%
17.9%
7.7%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.7%
9.1%
6.7%
10.3%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
4.3%
4.3%
8.0%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
10.5%
5.3%
2.3%
3.1%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3%
3.6%
2.3%
0.0%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.0%
15.9%
11.2%
8.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.6%
6.7%
7.8%
5.7%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5%
2.8%
1.0%
1.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

68.2%
74.5%
69.8%
72.3%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.5%
76.1%
76.1%
76.1%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.2%
63.4%
77.9%
74.4%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.0%
13.5%
12.1%
16.7%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened