Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Olathe Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Rebecca Randolph
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Horrible place. I wouldnt take my dead grandfather to this place. They dont care at all about the residents. Let them lay in wet beds, dont give much assistance. Dont follow diet restrictions. Horrible, horrible place. The dead wouldnt even be safe here.

  • Martha Wenzel
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom was cared for at Villa St Francis recently. Most facilities that are for profit have an adequate amount of staff, but nonprofit Villa has the most staff of any place I have seen. And they are wonderful and caring people. Anything that was needed happened immediately. We will miss this place. Thank you all!

  • Sarah Boston
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Villa St. Francis offers excellant care and service to seniors and their families. They go above and beyond to show passion in serving seniors. I have had clients who have lived here and raved about their great care here!

  • Jenna Cooper
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The compassion and quality of care they show their residents exceeds all expectations. Plus their commitment to the community, regardless of faith, demonstrates why they're so highly thought of in the KC area.

  • Susan Stivala
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My Mom was a resident at Villa St. Francis in the memory care hall for this past year. I found the staff to be very attentive to my Mom and her days were filled with activities and socialization which she needed. Sarah, Emmah and Susan will always hold a special place in my heart for their love and care of Mom.

About Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameVilla St. Francis, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1978 (42 years)
Capacity170
Residents159
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 28, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.

November 15, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$121,772 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 27 days

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.5%
98.1%
98.8%
98.8%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.4%
70.4%
55.2%
62.5%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
25.2%
28.8%
25.4%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
27.4%
13.3%
18.8%
19.4%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.3%
15.2%
12.0%
9.3%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.0%
15.4%
13.7%
13.7%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
8.5%
9.5%
9.0%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7%
2.4%
0.6%
1.7%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
2.6%
1.8%
2.8%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
6.2%
6.5%
9.4%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
2.6%
7.4%
4.1%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
2.5%
4.1%
1.4%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.5%
90.8%
96.4%
98.8%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.6%
95.1%
93.7%
93.7%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
51.0%
62.2%
65.2%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.3%
11.4%
3.4%
3.7%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places