Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Villa St Joseph

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Overland Park Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Terry Kattop
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Excellent, Excellent care here! My husband was at another Rehab and he was not doing well. This rehab is so beautiful. The surrounding is humble and uplifting. Especially for my husband as he is demanding. We came here and our favorite place to spend time is in a sunroom. We have been here for rehab for 1 month & 1 week. My husband has blossomed. He is smiling every day and flirts with the therapists. That's how I know he is doing better. This place was highly recommended by friends. I drive longer but it is worth it. The Rehab and RN team is what makes St Joseph Place very very special. I'd recommend to everyone. They know how to approach and work with everyone. St. Joseph family is A+!

  • Paula Berlin
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I'd give this place " no stars" if I could. Completely void of any real quality or innovation. The staff ( management in particular) are awful and full of pretense. All the residents there just eat and lay around. No desire for programmatic change or any sophistication. They let the minds of residents "die a slow death". And this is where our Medicaid tax dollars go to??? Ghastly.

  • Stephanie Marrs
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I absolutely love St. Joseph Place! The staff is friendly and the nursing team is knowledgeable and very helpful. It's a warm and welcoming home!

  • Carrie van buskirk
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I gave 4 stars because I have seen some room for improvement with response time and CNA knowledge/communication; however, our overall experience has been incredibly positive! The medical director and nursing staff has been wonderful communicators! The therapy staff are compassionate and thorough along with communicative with family! The environment is tidy. Our dad has been treated with dignity from the moment he arrived. The administrative staff has been highly responsive! Our loved one has had very complex needs from an out of state transfer to multiple hospitalizations, and the social worker/ medical director have been on top of things! We are entering end of life care needs now, so I'll update further in time, but for now, we've been pleased with our experience at St. Joseph's Place.

  • Rekha Agarwal
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I had great expectations from this place. But I am disappointed. My father is admitted here and no care. Staff did not come even after 4 to 5 hours of ringing the bell. My father needs someone for his needs of lavatory but no one cares. His lunch and dinner served in the room but he needs some personal care. In all these fronts I am disappointed. On reception ,the people there don't know anything about any inquires. Don't know how to help him as I am not in USA.

About Villa St Joseph

General Information

Legal Business NameCarondelet Long Term Care Facilities Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 20, 1989 (31 years)
Capacity132
Residents88
Percent Occupied67%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Villa St Joseph

Villa St Joseph was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 16, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

July 26, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Villa St Joseph require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.7%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.4%
91.4%
86.6%
82.5%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
43.6%
39.5%
50.0%
57.1%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.6%
12.3%
15.3%
16.9%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.1%
21.2%
14.2%
23.6%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.6%
8.9%
9.9%
10.1%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
9.6%
8.6%
18.8%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.4%
3.8%
2.5%
5.1%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6%
6.7%
4.4%
4.3%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6%
7.7%
7.9%
8.5%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.5%
13.0%
9.2%
8.9%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
7.5%
7.5%
10.3%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6%
8.6%
7.3%
5.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
3.5%
3.0%
2.1%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.7%
73.4%
70.3%
77.2%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.8%
66.4%
66.4%
66.4%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.1%
65.7%
72.0%
60.1%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.5%
15.2%
5.3%
10.0%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.3%
2.6%
3.6%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
0.0%
1.4%
2.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places