Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rooks Co Senior Services Inc Dba Redbud Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Plainville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Rooks Co Senior Services Inc Dba Redbud Village

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1974 (43 years)
Capacity37
Residents31
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rooks Co Senior Services Inc Dba Redbud Village

Rooks Co Senior Services Inc Dba Redbud Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 7, 2016 - 7 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

May 10, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.

March 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rooks Co Senior Services Inc Dba Redbud Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.3%
11.1%
6.5%
7.4%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
32.2%
17.0%
3.5%
21.0%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.3%
29.6%
29.0%
37.0%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1%
26.1%
14.3%
17.4%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
35.3%
15.2%
13.3%
7.9%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7%
0.0%
6.5%
7.4%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.4%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
25.9%
6.5%
18.5%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
3.7%
6.5%
7.4%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened