Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brookdale Rosehill

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Shawnee
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Review written on behalf of Marie Marley who recently stayed with us. I was a resident at Brookdale Rosehill Skilled Care Rehab for one month. I was very pleased with all aspects of the care. I would especially like to recognize Lindsey, Mabel, Ruth, and Safari for excellence in nursing care. I was pleasantly surprised that the food was excellent and I gained back some of the weight lost while in the hospital. I would recommend this place to anyone who needs skilled care rehab services. ~ Marie Marley ~

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I recently had the opportunity to shadow nurses at Brookdale Rosehill as a student nurse. The facility is beautiful and is kept very clean. It has a very homey feel for the residents, there are plenty of common areas available for watching TV or visiting with family. I was able to work with the nurses and they are all so caring and take exceptional care of the residents. The three weeks I was there I really enjoyed the staff and the residents! If my loved ones were to need a facility I would definitely choose this one!

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I had the privilege of being a student nurse here for clinical and can say that I had one of the best experiences I could have hoped for. All of the staff are incredibly kind and caring, and each person knows the resident's like the back of their hand providing care that meets each individual's needs. I would absolutely trust this facility with my loved one after being able to see first hand the type of care that is provided. Management is also very kind and supportive of everyone in the facility. It was a very pleasant, happy environment and I want to sincerely thank you for having us!

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Run away as fast as you can! If your loved one is in need of memory care this is not the place for you! The response below from Lisa...former director is 100% true! Due to low staffing we were REQUIRED to have a family bedside 24 hrs a day 7 days a week for 14 days with NO break in cost and we were threatened by the current director that if we did not do this my mother would be forced to leave. Finally a staff member let it slip the reason behind that "we just don't have enough staff to cover her needs!" SERIOUSLY RUN!

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My brother was in Brookdale Rosehill for 2 months as part of his rehabilitation after a stroke and he liked it very much.All nurses, Mabel,Lindsay and Sherry were the absolute BEST and Therapists Elisha,Alicia,and Marcy and aids were all wonderful. Food was very good which was important to him as he had been on pureed food prior to coming there and was trying to regain some lost weight . They worked with him and helped him regain alot of his strength and mobility. Case Manager Jill was great and coordinated his care and departure and everything was always handled with my brothers best interest at heart. Great place ! Highly recommend this facility!

About Brookdale Rosehill

General Information

Legal Business NameArc Sweet Life Rosehill, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 30, 2004 (13 years)
Capacity92
Residents72
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brookdale Rosehill

Brookdale Rosehill
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

August 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

December 18, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brookdale Rosehill require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 50min
1hr 40min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 45min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
13.6%
10.0%
20.0%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
4.8%
-
-
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.5%
9.1%
21.7%
26.1%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
20.0%
-
10.0%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
4.8%
-
-
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.0%
9.5%
9.1%
4.3%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.5%
-
9.5%
5.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3%
9.5%
0.0%
8.7%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
4.5%
4.3%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.4%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.0%
97.7%
98.8%
100.0%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.9%
91.6%
91.6%
91.6%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.4%
67.3%
66.6%
72.6%
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.4%
21.5%
17.9%
23.5%
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.5%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places