Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sharon Lane Health Services

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Shawnee Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Melody Smith
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The owner of this facility has some issues now so you got thru 8 managers for housekeeping in a year its housekeeping but I loved my residents the cnas some were cool and some shouldn't be there at all in my month and a half of working here I seen abuse and neglect which I told someone higher than me and they did nothing about it....

  • Rebecca Tadlock
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Sharon Lane is an amazing facility. My father in-law moved in two years ago and he loves it. The staff are all so friendly and really care about the residents there. The facility is always clean and the menu is great. They can eat whenever they want and have so many options to chose from. The therapy team is also fantastic. I would recommend it to anyone looking for great care for their loved ones for short term or long term care.

  • Lisa
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    If you have a loved in this facility or really any other nursing home, please check on them as often as possible. Especially if it's a loved one with major physical handicaps, ones who can't speak or write. I has a friend who was bed ridden. My visits became more frequent and longer as time passed and I realized she wasn't being cared for. I had to ask whoever I could catch walking down the halls that she had not been given medications, baths, or bed changes. Alot of the time those messages never got back to her nurse. I'm sure there's a lack of staffing. But I dont think that means its ok to tell a visitor of a patient to "you go ahead and do it, if they can't wait". Luckily she's out of there. But at the same time it hurt to leave those helpless human beings in the "care" of the helpless.

  • jen b
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I am a current resident at Sharon Lane and have been here over a year. One of the best things about living here is the staff. They really treat everyone nicely, and you don't feel like you're left in the dark about your daily care. I am so happy that I found Sharon Lane, and I continue to recommend them to others in the community. Richard

  • Heidi Sh
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    After moving my mother between several different facilities over the last couple of years, I must say that Sharon Lane is by far the best place we have found. I've observed a sincere effort on the part of staff from different departments to get to know her and to accommodate her specific and changing needs. The staff truly seem to care about the residents, and this helps to create a more relaxed and homelike environment than any other facility my mom has resided in.

About Sharon Lane Health Services

General Information

Legal Business NameC And H Healthcare LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity95
Residents71
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sharon Lane Health Services

Sharon Lane Health Services was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 4, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sharon Lane Health Services require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 60min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 10min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.6%
65.0%
53.1%
65.4%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.0%
14.5%
16.7%
17.3%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.9%
24.9%
38.2%
18.9%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.8%
11.7%
10.3%
10.9%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.4%
15.1%
6.8%
12.5%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
6.8%
3.5%
5.7%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7%
6.8%
7.1%
7.9%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.5%
9.2%
1.2%
0.0%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
5.7%
9.4%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.5%
3.4%
3.5%
1.9%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
3.3%
1.7%
3.6%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
4.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.7%
100.0%
98.1%
98.2%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.0%
96.7%
96.7%
96.7%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.8%
74.0%
-
66.6%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.9%
22.0%
19.6%
4.1%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
2.6%
1.6%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places