Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brighton Place North

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Topeka
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Brighton Place North

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 1981 (35 years)
Capacity34
Residents34
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brighton Place North

Brighton Place North
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 24, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide residents with private access to a telephone.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brighton Place North require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

40min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
25min
ReportedExpected
LPN
15min
35min
ReportedExpected
RN
1hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.4%
79.4%
81.2%
81.2%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
0.0%
15.4%
30.8%
30.0%
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
75.8%
75.8%
75.0%
75.0%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.9%
0.0%
5.9%
5.1%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
15.6%
25.0%
3.2%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
2.4%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
6.1%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9%
3.0%
3.2%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
9.0%
8.6%
4.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened