Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rolling Hills Health Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Topeka Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • YaBoiAndy
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The employment here was terrible. Slow, never prepared for what they need, poorly trained/informed. Management was even worse. It's like they don't even care or know how horrid their employees are toward the residents. 0/10 would not recommend, find any other home. ANY.

  • Shay's Main
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I wish I could give these idiots 0 STARS!! If you love your family member DO NOT SEND THEM HERE!! Especially for rehabilitation! This place is a joke and so is the staff!! They are very rude!!! Very snobby attitudes!! They are unorganized and half the time they don't even give the right meds. The food is HORRIBLE and everything was just a mess!! I had to get my mother out of there ASAP!! THE WORSE FACILITY I HAVE EVER SEEN!!

  • Cherida DeWitt
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Some really nice nurses, doctor is the pits, and trying to get out is the pits. Cold food served, full of carbs, they don't give you messages, they will say one thing and do another. You must stay on top of them for insulin dosages, insist on prep pads.

  • XXX XXX
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I LOVE LOVE this place!!

  • Doug Cain
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Most areas is ok need to get more staff they are working on it

About Rolling Hills Health Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRolling Hills Health Center Operations, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 8, 1987 (32 years)
Capacity102
Residents83
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rolling Hills Health Center

Rolling Hills Health Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Rolling Hills Health Center has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rolling Hills Health Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

78.8%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.6%
67.5%
79.5%
80.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
43.1%
43.3%
36.7%
45.3%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.7%
20.9%
15.9%
15.3%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.8%
20.2%
18.0%
7.3%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.5%
15.1%
12.7%
15.5%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.7%
16.7%
7.4%
11.1%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.3%
3.8%
2.6%
2.6%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.9%
8.9%
3.6%
1.8%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
2.0%
4.7%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.8%
7.8%
4.0%
6.5%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.5%
2.6%
3.8%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

68.8%
93.6%
87.5%
88.7%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.7%
91.5%
91.5%
91.5%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
58.1%
55.8%
64.1%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.2%
22.5%
9.3%
8.9%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.7%
3.1%
0.0%
6.5%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places