Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kansas Masonic Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Kansas
  3. Wichita Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Henry Johns
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

About Kansas Masonic Home

General Information

Legal Business NameKansas Masonic Home
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1978 (40 years)
Capacity109
Residents100
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kansas Masonic Home

Kansas Masonic Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 19, 2017 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

May 23, 2017 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$49,558 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 14, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$67,917 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 4 days
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

February 17, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionPermit residents to remain in the facility and not be transferred or discharged without adequate reason.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

December 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kansas Masonic Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.0%
93.4%
93.4%
93.4%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3%
91.9%
90.1%
88.6%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.5%
72.7%
63.6%
56.5%
40.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.4%
29.2%
25.0%
22.1%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.0%
24.7%
30.6%
24.3%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.0%
20.9%
24.7%
26.6%
19.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.2%
12.7%
23.9%
6.6%
16.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
18.6%
17.5%
11.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
6.1%
5.0%
1.7%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
16.3%
17.2%
11.6%
13.7%
8.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6%
4.8%
2.6%
1.4%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.5%
9.3%
7.5%
7.6%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9%
7.0%
11.1%
8.9%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
3.6%
0.9%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.9%
93.5%
92.6%
92.7%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.3%
85.2%
85.2%
85.2%
75.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.1%
72.4%
61.8%
57.9%
70.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
32.3%
34.8%
28.7%
36.2%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
5.0%
2.6%
1.1%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
0.6%
1.0%
1.3%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places