Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Wichita Presbyterian Manor

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Kansas (KS)
  4. Wichita
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Wichita Presbyterian Manor

General Information

Legal Business NamePresbyterian Manors Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1994 (23 years)
Capacity50
Residents48
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Wichita Presbyterian Manor

Wichita Presbyterian Manor
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Kansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 2, 2016 - 5 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

June 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

October 30, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Wichita Presbyterian Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.7%
95.2%
95.2%
95.2%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.3%
90.0%
88.4%
92.9%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.4%
73.1%
70.4%
68.0%
39.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
18.2%
15.2%
13.3%
24.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.2%
9.8%
30.0%
27.9%
19.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.1%
7.5%
14.0%
19.0%
20.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4%
3.0%
27.3%
20.0%
16.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.6%
15.7%
11.8%
23.1%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
0.0%
4.7%
11.9%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
7.1%
3.2%
3.4%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.4%
2.6%
0.0%
2.4%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
9.5%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

56.8%
43.5%
21.6%
21.2%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.2%
78.3%
78.3%
78.3%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
81.2%
84.5%
75.3%
69.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.8%
25.7%
28.6%
24.1%
20.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.0%
6.1%
7.1%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016KS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened