Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cherry Ridge

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Louisiana
  3. Bastrop Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cindy Johnson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Our expierence was only 14 months . It was a few years ago but I could not complain, my beloved daddy was taken care of by mostly wonderful wonderful caring people that demonstrated real care. It's been hard to think back , but overall our family and my daddy was treated with dignity and respect. I still want to thank all of the people that were the 2013-2014 and more.

  • MDM # Jackie
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    The place to be for the best long-term care or short term for therapy we got you.....agape love given to every individual person its more than just a job to the workers at this place your loved ones are treated like family.....

  • Chardavion Johnson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Great place for your loved ones

  • Mary Hendrix
    ★★★★★ a year ago

About Cherry Ridge

General Information

Legal Business NameCherry Ridge Skilled Nursing Facility, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 20, 2002 (18 years)
Capacity110
Residents98
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cherry Ridge

Cherry Ridge was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Louisiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 27, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionOffer other nutritional food to each resident who will not eat the food served.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cherry Ridge require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.0%
46.3%
46.2%
44.1%
40.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3%
28.2%
31.2%
29.9%
26.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.0%
22.6%
16.8%
22.5%
16.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.1%
16.9%
3.0%
5.0%
17.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.0%
15.1%
10.5%
15.8%
16.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3%
8.5%
10.3%
7.2%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
5.2%
3.3%
2.3%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5%
8.6%
11.3%
16.4%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
1.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3%
3.7%
4.6%
9.6%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
4.7%
3.4%
2.4%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
0.8%
0.6%
2.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

86.5%
81.6%
94.7%
97.6%
83.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.9%
84.2%
84.2%
84.2%
78.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
59.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
26.7%
6.9%
13.8%
6.5%
10.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places