Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Nottingham Regional Rehab Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Louisiana
  3. Baton Rouge Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Stephanie Robinson
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    Staff is very rude, doesn't take care of patiences as required. I have seen meds left on hallway desk unattached. Staff become upset if question about care of family members. They will rush and clean a patient boby if you show up unexpected. No one ever known anything. They had my mom of meds and no other doctor knew why. I had to threaten to report staff one night just to get them to send her out to hospital. Her sugar level were 600, blood work/ ct scan showed she had kidney stone. She had been complaining for week about hurting. Staff sits around doing nothing for hours. I had my mom to press call button one day for her meds, it took them 45mins to answer. Another hour to bring meds.

  • lovejones123456 .
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I would not recommend this place. From what I witnessed, I would consider the level of care to be less than one star. We took my aunt out of there. If there would have been a "zero star" option, that's what I would have selected as my rating. Shame on the owners of this facility.

  • R3 Bail Bonds & Recovery USA
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Seem to care and take care of their patients

  • Dominique Range
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My Mom is here and I really Hate this Place.Every time I call I get the run around.You. can talk to the head staff and it still Don't change.My mom won't be in here to much longer

  • Tess Chapeau
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I worked at Nottingham for 3 years. The DONs and supervisors were great. However, the last 4 months of my employment, there was heavy turnover in administration, and the patient load became unmanageable due to the high acuity rate. All the nurses during the week quit on my hall. The supervisors were not empathetic to this issue, even after massive resignations of nurses. I had a patient who required being tube fed a small amount every 4 hours. He also had to be suctioned regularly. His family was demanding, which I understood, but with 25 patients, several with peg tubes, and all of them completely dependent, it was impossible to care for everyone. The administrator refused to remedy the situation. On top of that, my supervisor was unprofessional. I went on vacation and never went back.

About Nottingham Regional Rehab Center

General Information

Legal Business NameCplace Forest Park Snf, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 15, 2000 (20 years)
Capacity176
Residents139
Percent Occupied79%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Nottingham Regional Rehab Center

Nottingham Regional Rehab Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Louisiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 18, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHonor a residents' rights as a residents of the nursing home, free of coercion and reprisal, and as citizens or residents of the United States.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Nottingham Regional Rehab Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

71.7%
79.1%
78.9%
78.9%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.3%
71.7%
72.1%
58.3%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.0%
45.5%
50.0%
52.9%
40.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.0%
28.7%
17.6%
19.6%
26.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.1%
23.6%
49.7%
39.1%
16.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.0%
14.8%
11.0%
10.2%
17.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.5%
33.0%
32.0%
36.6%
16.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.6%
8.6%
7.4%
3.3%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
10.5%
2.3%
5.1%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.2%
7.9%
4.5%
7.2%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
4.3%
5.6%
5.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
2.5%
2.7%
2.5%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
2.5%
1.8%
1.7%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.8%
0.8%
1.8%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

6.2%
20.2%
29.0%
21.0%
83.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
8.3%
18.5%
18.0%
18.0%
78.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.9%
66.6%
82.8%
79.2%
59.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
29.6%
36.5%
40.9%
43.8%
10.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
1.5%
4.8%
3.8%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017LA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places