Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Carrington Place Of Springhill

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Louisiana (LA)
  4. Springhill
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    This should actually be two reviews ..... one pre-shunt surgery (two stars) and the other post (four/five stars). I have memories of my initial stay which becomes more and more clear as weeks go by, and a great deal of it is not good. These memories include staff bullying/beligerence, neglect, improper room placement, and lacking social services. Please note that during this time, there were also those staff members that were angels who got me through it. The initial part of my post surgery stay was also mired in bullying/beligerence, neglect, improper room placement, and lacking social services. I was allowed to lay for hours in wet diapers. I did not get a bath of any kind for six days. (I still don't know why the staff did not want to bathe me, it was odd) The staff did not know how to take care of my hair. I was allowed to sit endless hours in a "Geri Chair" in the room or in the dining room after others left. I was losing weight at an alarming rate. Physical therapy was a joke. I was told I had no money when in fact, I did have money. I had no shoes and could not buy even a coke. My friends who attempted to check on me via phone calls were told they could not speak to me. I had an infection under my thumb nail that was treated with an alcohol swab only. I had horrible bladder spasms on one occasion and begged for medical assistance over and over again . . . which was never provided. My purse, cell phone, and electric toothbrush disappeared. I was told that I could not fly/transfer to my family in New Jersey because I had not money for someone to fly with me. The Administrator became irate when I indicated to my family that I was being mistreated. When I began to recover and could "save myself" . . . treatment at this facility improved dramatically. I was finally removed from the room I shared with a person who prevented me from sleeping. I was allowed to use my laptop and was given access to the internet. Physical Therapy made significant changes to their staff and treatments. Most of the staff treated me with respect, love, and kindness. There were still a very few who still did not want to deal with me or bathe me. I had to call Medicaid myself to get my application approved - - the social worker had not followed up on this. Of note also is that there is a difference between the hall you are placed in and the service you receive. Having said that, however, some during my first stay were fives . . . always. When I was well enough to leave, I had bonded with almost everyone in the facility and left with respect and love for them. There were, of course, exceptions, but few. And, Social Services could be improved. What I did learn right before my departure is that the Administrator really does care about his patients and made it very clear to me that he would have helped me . . . if only I had known that I could go to him . . .

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Carrington Place Of Springhill

General Information

Legal Business NameCplace Of Springhill Snf, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity153
Residents74
Percent Occupied48%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Carrington Place Of Springhill

Carrington Place Of Springhill
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Louisiana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 12, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Carrington Place Of Springhill require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
37.5%
36.7%
55.2%
62.5%
39.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.9%
15.0%
13.3%
16.4%
26.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.7%
13.6%
9.7%
31.1%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.1%
27.5%
24.6%
21.6%
19.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
13.2%
13.0%
12.7%
16.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
2.8%
1.4%
3.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
2.5%
2.5%
2.6%
7.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
2.8%
2.8%
1.3%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9%
2.8%
1.4%
3.9%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
4.2%
2.5%
1.2%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.8%
11.3%
4.2%
5.3%
1.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
96.6%
91.3%
83.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
77.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
13.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
-
-
-
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016LA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places