Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Centerville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Christina S
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My grandfather has been at Cape Regency for about two years now and I am very pleased with how he's been treated. He is always in good spirits and I like to think that a lot of that is because of the staff, especially the friendly social worker, Jacqueline. He enjoys all the activities and events that are organized for the residents - especially the drum classes! There have been ups and downs, of course, but my family and I always feel welcome and comforted when we enters the doors at Cape Regency and I think that's what matters most.

  • Pat E
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I work in the Rehab Department and Am very happy here. The Rehab staff is second to none. It is a wonderful group of experienced, knowledgeable and compassionate therapists who are strong patient/resident advocates. Our patients are extremely happy with the functional focus of their treatment. It is a pleasure to be here

  • Kapechick
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I've worked at CR for almost 5 years. , I love our open door policy. We are not always perfect but if there is a problem we are happy to address any concerns. We have a great management team here and work diligently everyday to make this a better facility.

  • Becki Lauzon
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I am a hospice nurse that visits patients at Cape Regency. Staff is friendly and knowledgeable. Observe them interact with other staff and their residents- very family like atmosphere. Wonderful place.

  • Quinn Campbell
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The quality of care is outstanding! The staff works very hard to meet the needs of their residents. Social services department is very helpful and organized. Keep up the good work!

About Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameCape Regency Ma Snf LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 24, 1989 (31 years)
Capacity120
Residents108
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 12, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.

April 7, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,900 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

February 25, 2016 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$39,488 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

89.0%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
96.2%
91.4%
92.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.1%
86.4%
90.9%
76.0%
54.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.0%
17.6%
13.6%
7.5%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.5%
20.3%
29.4%
30.5%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.4%
19.2%
20.0%
14.3%
18.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.3%
9.7%
24.6%
15.9%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
3.8%
6.5%
8.6%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2%
8.6%
9.3%
3.2%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3%
1.9%
6.9%
1.7%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3%
3.8%
2.6%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
3.7%
5.1%
3.7%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3%
4.9%
2.2%
1.4%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
1.2%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.0%
70.9%
50.9%
42.9%
79.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.3%
63.8%
63.8%
63.8%
82.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.5%
77.5%
74.2%
72.3%
61.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.7%
17.1%
25.0%
24.3%
13.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.2%
1.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places