Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Chelsea Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • elizanh123 .
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The staff make this a good experience and care for my Dad for the last 2 years. They care about their work with the patients. They offer opportunities such as bingo, crafts, cookouts, and restaurant trips. The rec. director makes it fun. This is a skilled nursing facility with excellent RN nurses and CNAs. Common space is open planning living room/room dining room home like open style with an open kitchen. You will not see nursing home equipment in halls or spaces making it feel more like a home. The cafe and lobby is new and modern w large windows looking out over Boston's skyline. It makes a nice meeting place with coffee and pastry.

  • Linda Blackman
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My elderly aunt was transferred to the rehab unit. Be careful as I was her piwer of attorney snd health care proxy. They refused to speak with me or provide information until my husband and I flew from our home 600 miles away to sign papers with my aunt. My husband, a prominent physician, read the chart and determined that she was receiving an unnecessary med that was adversely affecting her. With his urging they tapered the meds but they needed more time for the meds to wash out of her system. Fortunately my aunt got much better. Terrible medical care delivered thoughtless!!!

  • Denise Burke
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My aunt is there now for a few weeks and she has NOTHING but wonderful things to say about the staff, rooms, and food. If she is happy then I am happy.

  • Timothy Walsh
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My personal experience with this place was disgusting. my grandmother broke her hip and they did nothing to help her,she laid there in pain and she was cold because they gave her this tiny blanket, I literally had to ask them to give her pain meds *they don't treat people well at this place *I wouldn't have even gave it a star but I had to rate this place. Look into this place before you put any of your loved ones there.

  • s.michael Bernard
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My Mother was here in 2012 for rehab . I was very happy that she was able to be there because for all the bad things you hear about nursing homes none of those issues occured here. The first thing you will notice is when you walk in there is no offensive smells. The staff is caring, attentive , pay attention . Physical therapists do an excellent job and my Mother was determined to work hard and come home . The therapists did a great job and she was ready to come in 2 weeks because they did a great job and she did what she was told to do so when she did come home.the 85 year old woman who could not get out of bed without assistance 2 weeks earlier had improved that she was 75% better than 2 weeks earlier . The food is fresh with many choices and excellent for an institutional facility . Steven Beadles

About Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameChelsea Jewish Nursing Home, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1990 (30 years)
Capacity123
Residents110
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home

Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 5, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,863 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
55.0%
54.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.5%
8.6%
9.3%
10.4%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.3%
14.4%
7.7%
2.5%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
13.2%
14.9%
19.8%
18.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.5%
2.9%
7.7%
3.4%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.6%
8.0%
9.7%
5.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
2.4%
4.7%
2.1%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
2.1%
4.1%
2.9%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.4%
99.3%
100.0%
100.0%
79.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.9%
98.7%
98.7%
98.7%
82.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.6%
74.3%
80.4%
68.2%
61.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places