Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Ctr

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Fall River Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kyle Howard
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Thank you Sarah Brayton! My mother's declining health forced the uncomfortable move to a nursing home. After viewing several facilities, my father chose Sarah Brayton and we are all happy that he did. Most important, Mom is happy, is eating well and is being well cared for. The staff made this emotional transition much easier than it might have been, which we are grateful for. Finally, we feel welcome whenever we come by to visit with Mom.

  • Alicia Kadlec
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    this is the (((WORST))) nursing home in fall river!!!!!!!!!!!! THE WORST ? horrible staff, vy rude... my dad was sent to this sh?t hole from charlton hospital for therapy for a short 2 week stay. took him out less then 24hrs. this place is discussing big time* when charlton dropped my dad off to this hell on earth nursing home. he was left in a room all day, no nurse answered his calls. he didn't get a meal til after 10pm at night. sad how these "so called" nurses get top dollars to do sh?t for our elderly folks. MY RATING ???

  • Lizette Sousa
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My mother in law went to Sarah Brayton for rehab and received exceptional care by all staff. Discharge planning was excellent and all staff we dealt with was kind, friendly, professional, and empathetic. We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Sarah Brayton for their superb service.

  • Ryan Comeau
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    We had a family member there and the care was exceptional. The nurses were well versed on my grandfathers issues and attentive to his needs. The CNA's were so very caring and treated my grandfather like he was their grandfather. Of course there are always concerns but as we brought them up each was one addressed to beyond our satisfaction. Facility food will never compare to home cooking and I'm sure that cooking for 150 people can be very difficult, but they even tried to make sure he got the foods he really liked because they are aware how important nutrition is! I can't say thank you enough. Although my grandfather eventually passed away there, the staff was so caring and I'm glad they were there in his last moments because they had become like family! Kudos to the whole Sarah Brayton Crew! Top notch!

  • Kate Levesque
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I have a friend who was recently promoted to nursing director there. She is very excited about the building and proud to talk about all the hard-working staff and her love for the patients! I have known her my whole life and know her passion for the elderly. Your loved ones will be well taken care of.

About Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Ctr

General Information

Legal Business Name4901 North Main Street Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 11, 1993 (27 years)
Capacity183
Residents172
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Ctr

Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Ctr was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 7, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Ctr require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.7%
94.2%
94.2%
94.2%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.6%
91.7%
89.0%
93.7%
92.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
30.8%
24.0%
41.4%
42.3%
54.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.6%
22.8%
20.7%
19.9%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.4%
23.0%
13.9%
9.3%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.0%
18.2%
18.2%
16.5%
18.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
14.2%
12.8%
15.1%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.0%
8.5%
5.6%
5.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8%
4.9%
3.3%
7.8%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
1.7%
0.8%
2.4%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.8%
9.9%
5.7%
2.4%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.8%
2.1%
1.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
3.4%
2.8%
1.4%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

63.0%
75.8%
86.8%
82.9%
79.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.2%
72.8%
72.8%
72.8%
82.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.8%
55.5%
49.5%
52.4%
61.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.9%
18.8%
17.4%
20.0%
13.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.7%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
1.1%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places