Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Royal Wood Mill Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Lawrence Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Tommy Ramirez
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I don't know what that nut Nancy Miller is complaining about - I think she was using drugs and didn't pay her bills - I love this place! They took great care of my Aunt and they took great care of me after I had some surgery! Thank you!

  • Nancy Miller
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I was there for 15 months and my health went down hill. Use of their doctors is a joke; nothing gets done. CNA care is atrocious, they don't work but sit and collect their wages. Patients are ignored and left in bed or placed in dayroom to sit all day in wet diapers. This place should be condemned.

  • Christine Rivera
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    At work intil 11pm

About Royal Wood Mill Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLown Acquisition LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1990 (30 years)
Capacity94
Residents74
Percent Occupied79%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Royal Wood Mill Center

* Rating not displayedOverall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Rating not displayedStaff Rating
* Rating not displayedRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 2, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Royal Wood Mill Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
3hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

89.0%
88.2%
88.2%
88.2%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.1%
64.9%
60.3%
56.1%
92.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.2%
58.3%
63.3%
48.3%
54.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.1%
26.9%
31.2%
26.6%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.1%
20.2%
18.5%
16.5%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.7%
36.2%
36.6%
37.5%
18.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
7.9%
26.2%
20.3%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.0%
4.3%
5.9%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2%
6.8%
6.1%
4.8%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
2.9%
11.4%
5.6%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2%
2.7%
5.9%
3.1%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
1.5%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.0%
3.8%
5.3%
2.2%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
3.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

23.3%
31.2%
20.6%
5.8%
79.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.0%
37.5%
37.5%
37.5%
82.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
25.8%
13.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2%
5.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places