Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Massachusetts (MA)
  4. Peabody
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Evan Taylor
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    They are behind in a lot of departments. They are not respectful to patients or the needs of the patients. Treat people like children and there is no compation here. Do not come here,

  • Mary Olsen
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I was in rehab there in March 2016 ,after heart surgery. PT and OT were great.A few nurses and aides were good, the others did as little as possible.Rooms were kept very clean. Food was atrocious.Don't know how they expect people to recover on packaged,frozen food.One morning my breakfast was a hard boiled egg and a cinnamon donut. I was on a low salt diet and was served a frozen chicken pot pie.Another night,corned beef .

  • bukia chalvire
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    worst place ever. the first floor nurses and aids are great. the second floor is a nightmare. the room are not clean properly, the nurses always have and attitude, they don't care about the patients. the only thing decent about this place is the social worker and a couple nurses aids.

  • Jessica Lane
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Would NOT recommend this facility. Observed aides ignoring patients call bells, administration whispering about patients, unprofessional behavior and intimidation throughout the 60 days a family member resided in this facility. The rehab OT and PT are good, but the administration treats their staff poorly except their "chosen favorites". They do have a few excellent nurses and aides who do the BULK of the work. Nursing supervisor on the first floor spends more time doing paperwork and eating takeout then assisting patients needs. It's not a good place for people to go - avoid it if possible!

  • msichana mrembo
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Residents are treated with dignity and respect. Its clean, food is home made and the chef is great.This place has been deficiency free and 98% +ve survey. Staffing is great , sometimes short staffing is unavoidable but care is not at all compromised. Because its a nonprofit they invest profit back to the facility. Its a family of caring individuals. I recomend this place 99% .....

About Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePeabody Management Systems, Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity152
Residents123
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center

Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
95.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.0%
97.3%
97.2%
95.4%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.8%
57.4%
58.3%
51.2%
53.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.5%
18.4%
18.8%
18.0%
21.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.5%
21.8%
11.4%
26.1%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.8%
12.7%
13.4%
11.3%
18.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.1%
2.3%
12.8%
13.3%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2%
3.8%
5.7%
6.7%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5%
6.0%
4.8%
7.3%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.0%
5.9%
5.9%
6.0%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
2.8%
5.7%
4.7%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
1.8%
2.8%
4.6%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

81.0%
91.5%
89.9%
81.4%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.4%
89.8%
89.8%
89.8%
83.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.0%
56.9%
68.7%
83.0%
55.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.5%
2.1%
3.0%
8.9%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places